Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense - Subject: Temporary Reinforcement as a Berlin Deterrent (S)
Ask the Scholar
Page 13 of 16
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
your
TOP SECRET
(5) With prior alert the first aircraft would arrive
1
at Chambley at H plus 17:19 hours and all four squadrons
2
would be in France at H plus 27:32 hours. The squadron
3
for Incirlik would completely arrive by H plus 43:24
4
hours. Without prior notice the first aircraft would
5
land at H plus 23:16 hours and four squadrons would be
6
in France by H plus 49:19 hours. The squadron for
7
Incirlik would be in place by H plus 66:34 hours.
8
8. Second Item - Section C, Item 12. Move the following
9
military forces under cover of rotation and/or scheduled
10
exercise:
11
"b. Elements of 2nd Fleet to war stations, exercising
12
from UK ports and in the Norwegian Sea. 11
13
a. Costs. If this movement were carried out during
14
June or July when 2nd Fleet ships are assembled off the
15
East Coast, no significant additional costs are foreseen.
16
Similarly, in August, if relieved units of the Sixth
17
Fleet are routed to the East Coast by way of the UK and
18
Norwegian Sea, no significant additional costs are foreseen.
19
b. Implications.
20
(1) A movement of this magnitude should be presented
21
to the NAC prior to implementation.
22
(2) Crisis in the Caribbean may preclude the use of
23
either of the concepts stated above.
24
(3) Country consultations with the UK and other
25
nations would be required to effect visits by US ships
26
to foreign ports. If carrier based aircraft are to be
27
exercised, it may be necessary to obtain overflight
28
rights dependent on nature of exercise.
29
TOP SECRET
12
Appendix D
JCSM-385-61
SRGRES
Page data
- Page
- 13
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 2e8672fa4143d3ad
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 6037287
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "6037287",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6037287",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense - Subject: Temporary Reinforcement as a Berlin Deterrent (S)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6037287",
"collections": [
"Robert S. McNamara Papers",
"Records Relating to the Defense Program and Operations"
],
"subjects": [
"Berlin Wall, Berlin, Germany, 1961-1989"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-007.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-007.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-007.jpg",
"imageCount": 16,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "6037287",
"label": "Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense - Subject: Temporary Reinforcement as a Berlin Deterrent (S)",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6037287"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "6037287",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6037287",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense - Subject: Temporary Reinforcement as a Berlin Deterrent (S)",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6037287",
"collections": [
"Robert S. McNamara Papers",
"Records Relating to the Defense Program and Operations"
],
"subjects": [
"Berlin Wall, Berlin, Germany, 1961-1989"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-007.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-007.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-007.jpg",
"imageCount": 16,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/6037287",
"naId": 6037287,
"levelOfDescription": "item",
"productionDates": [
{
"day": 6,
"logicalDate": "1961-06-06",
"month": 6,
"year": 1961
}
],
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 13,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/opastorage/live/87/372/6037287/content/arcmedia/research/1961-berlin-crisis/932006-3-4-16/Memo-For-SecDef-June-6-1961-015.jpg",
"mediaId": "2e8672fa4143d3ad",
"ocrText": "your\nTOP SECRET\n(5) With prior alert the first aircraft would arrive\n1\nat Chambley at H plus 17:19 hours and all four squadrons\n2\nwould be in France at H plus 27:32 hours. The squadron\n3\nfor Incirlik would completely arrive by H plus 43:24\n4\nhours. Without prior notice the first aircraft would\n5\nland at H plus 23:16 hours and four squadrons would be\n6\nin France by H plus 49:19 hours. The squadron for\n7\nIncirlik would be in place by H plus 66:34 hours.\n8\n8. Second Item - Section C, Item 12. Move the following\n9\nmilitary forces under cover of rotation and/or scheduled\n10\nexercise:\n11\n\"b. Elements of 2nd Fleet to war stations, exercising\n12\nfrom UK ports and in the Norwegian Sea. 11\n13\na. Costs. If this movement were carried out during\n14\nJune or July when 2nd Fleet ships are assembled off the\n15\nEast Coast, no significant additional costs are foreseen.\n16\nSimilarly, in August, if relieved units of the Sixth\n17\nFleet are routed to the East Coast by way of the UK and\n18\nNorwegian Sea, no significant additional costs are foreseen.\n19\nb. Implications.\n20\n(1) A movement of this magnitude should be presented\n21\nto the NAC prior to implementation.\n22\n(2) Crisis in the Caribbean may preclude the use of\n23\neither of the concepts stated above.\n24\n(3) Country consultations with the UK and other\n25\nnations would be required to effect visits by US ships\n26\nto foreign ports. If carrier based aircraft are to be\n27\nexercised, it may be necessary to obtain overflight\n28\nrights dependent on nature of exercise.\n29\nTOP SECRET\n12\nAppendix D\nJCSM-385-61\nSRGRES"
}