Extracted text

OCR Page 1 of 34
THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN NEWS SUMMARY Sept. 19, 1973 (Tues. nets, wires. Comment separate) The major stories of the day: "Topic A, 11 said Chancellor in lead story on all nets, was story by "highly respected" Broder that senior GOP figure feels VP's resignation is 99-1/2% certain. HKS began by noting Post's "excellent batting record" on W gate revelations. Nets featured WH "no comments" as signal that VP has, as NBC put it, 'run out of friends at 1600 Penn. Ave. " Jarriel saw WH stance as continuation of gradual step-up of WH signals that could result in VP resignation and the ABC man made comparison to WH position on Gray after Admin privately gave up on his confirmation and left him "hanging in the wind" Rather said WH stance was widely interpreted signal that per- haps RN wouldn't mind seeing VP depart. WH was warned, said Rather, of impression left by no comments, but still "no comment. 11 Similarly, NBC's Brokaw said "no comment" was response when Warren was asked about view of VP backers who see "no comment" policy as "kiss of death" for VP. Vic Gold on ABC/NBC clips charging WH was seeking VP's removal -- "piranhas" was his description on NBC of Laird, Haig, AG and he said RN is responsible for letting it happen. ABC clip as Gold saw "osmotic conspiracy" and effort to divert attention from W'gate. VP shown on all nets at Bhutto reception and subsequently saying he'd not comment on undisclosed source stories. NBC noted source close to VP is increasingly confident he'll not resign; that Post story was "overreading" of something VP may' toyed with -- perhaps while in "a dark mood, 11 added VP press secy, Thomson later. And NBC noted Goldwater says subject hasn't come up at their recent and numerous meetings, but he'd advise Veep to fight it out. Later, w/reports citing BG as Broder source, the Sen. denied that and said he thinks VP will stay on ABC/NBC noted VP friends feel any resignation would be out of character for a man who's a fighter and, added NBC, it could be seen as admission of guilt and would undermine legal case that impeachment must precede indictment. But,