Ask the Scholar
Page 1 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
0 0 P Y
565 CENTRAL AVENUE
EASr ORANGE,
N. J.
June 17th, 1921.
Dear Mr. Roeder:-
unny Your letter June 15th on hand. Forwarding of
checks in the way practiced during my past connection with R. L. M. will
be perfectly satisfactory to me.
Sorry I could not attend matter of Bilstéin any sooner
since I just arrived this noon from out the town trip.
If it ie desirable I would talk over the matter of changing
the grades of undark with Bilstein and after several samples are made and
compared by me, 1 would suggest what I would do in the case.
Be it under-
stood, however, that the fact does not need to be considered a.s intrusion
on my part.
Comparison of old and new material off hand and roughly
speaking would look as follows:-
Old
Mkrgr
New
D
100
75
E
66.6
55
F
50
40
G
33.3
27 or 25
H
25
-
IM I
16.6
16.6
J
12.5
12.5
Using new zinc and maintaining ite quality constant - or
(it is hard to do that in present zinc lab.) selecting only suitable zine -
that ie rejecting any run not coming up to quality - will make this reduction
Page data
- Page
- 1
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- 932d238c4685727d
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75718613
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75718613",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75718613",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Received to Mr. Roeder [A. Roeder], June 17, 1921",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75718613",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75718613",
"label": "Letters Received to Mr. Roeder [A. Roeder], June 17, 1921",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75718613"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75718613",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75718613",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Received to Mr. Roeder [A. Roeder], June 17, 1921",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75718613",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75718613",
"naId": 75718613,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 1,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0000119_Page_1.jpg",
"mediaId": "932d238c4685727d",
"ocrText": "0 0 P Y\n565 CENTRAL AVENUE\nEASr ORANGE,\nN. J.\nJune 17th, 1921.\nDear Mr. Roeder:-\nunny Your letter June 15th on hand. Forwarding of\nchecks in the way practiced during my past connection with R. L. M. will\nbe perfectly satisfactory to me.\nSorry I could not attend matter of Bilstéin any sooner\nsince I just arrived this noon from out the town trip.\nIf it ie desirable I would talk over the matter of changing\nthe grades of undark with Bilstein and after several samples are made and\ncompared by me, 1 would suggest what I would do in the case.\nBe it under-\nstood, however, that the fact does not need to be considered a.s intrusion\non my part.\nComparison of old and new material off hand and roughly\nspeaking would look as follows:-\nOld\nMkrgr\nNew\nD\n100\n75\nE\n66.6\n55\nF\n50\n40\nG\n33.3\n27 or 25\nH\n25\n-\nIM I\n16.6\n16.6\nJ\n12.5\n12.5\nUsing new zinc and maintaining ite quality constant - or\n(it is hard to do that in present zinc lab.) selecting only suitable zine -\nthat ie rejecting any run not coming up to quality - will make this reduction"
}