Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 3
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
W. H. Gallantine, Esqae
George B. Pesinger, Esq.
2
opinion tha t this is olearly radium poisoning, the question will
arise whether or not you wish to have the radium company con-
sider the question of settlement under the understanding arrived
at in the Tuck case. That understanding was that the Radium
Company could settle (the amount to be approved by the insurance
ampanies) with the agreement that if the Tuck case should be
decided in favor of the Radium Company that then the insurance
companies would reimburse the United States Radium Company.
The two questions to be presented in the
Tuck ca.se are, first whether or not there is any coverage,
and second, the pro rate share to be paid by each insurance
company.
Yours very truly,
EAM:AG
COLLINS & CORBIN.
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- photo
- Media ID
- b0dd9dafe925639b
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75726557
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75726557",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726557",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Received to W.H. Gallantine [W.H. Galentine], George E. Pesinger, June 16, 1931",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726557",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75726557",
"label": "Letters Received to W.H. Gallantine [W.H. Galentine], George E. Pesinger, June 16, 1931",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726557"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75726557",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726557",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Received to W.H. Gallantine [W.H. Galentine], George E. Pesinger, June 16, 1931",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726557",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_1.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_1.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_1.jpg",
"imageCount": 3,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75726557",
"naId": 75726557,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "photo",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002486_Page_2.jpg",
"mediaId": "b0dd9dafe925639b",
"ocrText": "W. H. Gallantine, Esqae\nGeorge B. Pesinger, Esq.\n2\nopinion tha t this is olearly radium poisoning, the question will\narise whether or not you wish to have the radium company con-\nsider the question of settlement under the understanding arrived\nat in the Tuck case. That understanding was that the Radium\nCompany could settle (the amount to be approved by the insurance\nampanies) with the agreement that if the Tuck case should be\ndecided in favor of the Radium Company that then the insurance\ncompanies would reimburse the United States Radium Company.\nThe two questions to be presented in the\nTuck ca.se are, first whether or not there is any coverage,\nand second, the pro rate share to be paid by each insurance\ncompany.\nYours very truly,\nEAM:AG\nCOLLINS & CORBIN."
}