Science and Technology (Bromley) 1991 [6]

Originally Processed With FOIA(s): FOIA Number: 1998-0004-F[2]; 2005-0336-F S FOIA MARKER This is not a textual record. This is used as an administrative marker by the George Bush Presidential Library Staff. Record Group/Collection: George H.W. Bush Presidential Records Collection/Office of Origin: Chief of Staff, White House Office of Series: Sununu, John, Files Subseries: White House Offices Files OA/ID Number: 29184 Folder ID Number: 29184-006 Folder Title: Science and Technology (Bromley) (1991) [6] Stack: Row: Section: Shelf: Position: G 15 25 6 1 subuhu, John SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (BROM LE4)(1991)(6) [OA/ID 29184-006] THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON has THE seen CHIEF of STAFF December 21, 1990 MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN H. SUNUNU FROM: D. ALLAN BROMLEY Auan SUBJECT: Congressional Earmarks for R&D A few days ago I told you I would send you a study identifying the earmarks made by Congress in FY 1991 appropriations for R&D items that are for particular institutions or locations and were not included in the President's budget. That study is attached. The study identified 492 such earmarks, totaling $809.6 million. Of these 325 ($182.2 million) were in Agriculture, where I understand specific earmarking is customary in Congress. In other areas, R&D earmarking seems on the rise, with 48 in Energy and between 20 to 30 each in Defense, Interior, GSA, and EPA. In Defense $253.4 million of the "peace dividend" was applied to R&D earmarks, which were exempted from a previously enacted legal requirement for competition. Also noteworthy is the $60.7 million in a GSA appropriation for R&D construction at 21 universities and other private institutions. As far as I know, neither GSA nor the Treasury-Post Office subcommittees, where these items originated, normally have responsibilities for such items. The R&D earmarks have put an extra squeeze of at least $332 million on the R&D programs as proposed in the President's budget. The most serious impacts appear likely to be in Energy and Agriculture. The other $475 million of R&D earmarks were covered by increases in the R&D accounts, which presumably means that a corresponding squeeze was applied elsewhere in the budget. At least 25 of the earmarks appear to call for the establishment of new centers, institutions, or other organizations. In most of these cases, continued federal support in future years seems clearly implied. Thus, this year's earmarks have put a built-in squeeze on future budgets, an effect that will be compounded as additional earmarks are made in future years. I should emphasize that this study covered only R&D related earmarks, not all earmarks. Thus, it did not cover such items as the Lawrence Welk memorial, highway "demonstration" projects, or the $200 million earmarked for the Weatherization program in the Energy Department. It should also be noted that the study was based only on a review of the often meager information in the Congressional reports and bills. Therefore, it did not identify the sponsorship of the earmarks and does not provide a basis for judgments on the merits of the earmarked items or on the motivations of the earmarking. A case-by- case review with agency or Congressional staff directly involved would be needed to determine to what degree each earmark was (1) a response to advocacy by an institution, (2) a parochial initiative in Congress, or (3) a recognition by Congress of a significant national or programmatic need. If you would wish such a sponsorship analysis, it will take a little time, but we will be happy to produce it for you. Attachments Shapley/Bromley memorandum of December 17, 1990, with Tables I, II and III and separate tabulation cc: Richard G. Darman December 17, 1990 MEMORANDUM FOR D. ALLAN BROMLEY FROM: WILLIS H. SHAPLEY SUBJECT: Analysis of Congressional Actions on R&D for FY 1991 As requested, I have reviewed Congressional actions on R&D items for FY 1991, as shown in the pertinent Congressional reports and bills, to quantify the actions on funds appropriated for R&D and to identify Congressional "earmarks" for R&D items not included in the President's budget. A, Summary of Data The results of the review are summarized in Table I, with details given in Tables II and III, and a separate tabulation. These materials show that: 1) The net impact of Congressional appropriations actions on the $71.2 billion identified by OMB for R&D in the FY 1991 budget was a reduction of about $2.6 billion, of which $2.2 billion was the net reduction in DOD R&D activities. On the non-defense side, reductions for NASA ($1.1 billion) and NSF ($.1 billion) were offset in part by increases for HHS ($.4 billion), Agriculture ($.1 billion), and various other agencies ($.3 billion). The analysis reflects explicit Congressional actions on identifiable R&D items covering 92% of the OMB total. Details are shown in Table II. The AAAS analysis, subsequently received, comes to almost exactly the same total, although there are differences in the amounts estimated for individual agencies. 2) In the appropriation process, Congress earmarked a total of $809.6 million for R&D items for specific institutions or locations, the largest amounts being in Agriculture, DOD, and Energy. As shown in Table III, a total of 492 such earmarks were identifed, of which 325 were in Agriculture, 48 in Energy, and 28 in DOD. On the basis of the often meager explanations given, 111 earmarks have been classified as for construction or provision of facilities and 381 for R&D operations. A total of 65 of the earmarks were specified in the appropriations bills; the other 381 appeared in appropriations committee reports only. Table III-B shows the number and amounts of the earmarks made by the various appropriations subcommittees. The earmarks identified are listed in detail in the separate tabulation. B. Some Qualifications With respect to the earmarks listed, it should be noted that: 1) The list excludes (1) programmatic earmarks not pointed at particular institutions or locations; (2) earmarks to established federal and national laboratories; (3) earmarks for non-R&D related purposes (e.g., DOE Weatherization); and (4) "invisible" earmarks communicated by Congress to the agencies in ways other than the appropriation bills or reports. 2) The list includes (1) earmarks for R&D operations as well as for construction of facilities; (2) earmarks for on-going activities and for new activities specifically authorized by law where the budget recommended no funding; and (3) earmarks where a specific institution or location appears to be implied although not named. 3) In many cases the reports do not characterize the earmarks fully by location, institution, and type of activity; therefore, more or less arbitrary judgments have been necessary in classifying them for analysis. 4) The data available do not support judgments on the merits of the earmarks or on the motivations for the earmarking. Without a case-by-case review with agency or Congressional staff directly involved, it is not possible to determine to what degree each earmark was (1) a response to advocacy by an institution, (2) a parochial initiative in Congress, or (3) a recognition by Congress of a significant national or programmatic need. C. Analysis The following points emerge from analysis of the data on earmarks: 1) Academic Institutions can be identified as the beneficiaries of only about half of the earmarks. Excluding the 271 Agriculture operations earmarks (where the data do not reliably identify academic recipients), there are 221 earmarks totalling $724.4 million for operations and facilities, of which only 101 ($348.1 million) are for academic institutions. The other recipients include non-profit institutions, and private, state, local, and cooperative federal-state entities. For facilities earmarks only, the ratio is somewhat higher. Including those in Agriculture, academic institutions received 67 ($276.3 million) out of the total of 111 ($427.5 million). The agency breakdown of the 67 is 30 Agriculture, 15 G.S.A., 13 DOE, 7 DOD, and 2 all others. 2) Major science programs: There were no earmarks in most of the major programs supporting science in universities, including NSF, NIH, DOE General Science, NASA, and the Agriculture competitive grants program. The exceptions are the DOE Basic Energy Sciences, Biological and Environmental Research, and other Energy Supply programs (33 earmarks) and the DOD University Research Initiative (7 earmarks). 3) Trends: Although comparable data for prior years is not available, it is apparent that there was a significant increase in Congressional earmarking in the FY 1991 appropriations. The study of FY 1990 earmarks by James Savage covered academic earmarks only; his total (excluding all Agriculture) of 34 in FY 1990 appears generally comparable to our corresponding figure of 71 for FY 1991, with the major increases taking place in DOE, DOE and GSA. This and other evidence indicate a major change this year in Congressional practices with respect to R&D earmarks, especially in three subcommittee areas (see Table III-B). The Energy and Water Resources subcommittees abandoned the relative restraint shown last year and made a total of 33 earmarks. The Defense subcommittees made 28 earmarks and specifically exempted them from previously enacted legislative requirements for competition. The Treasury-Post Office subcommittees inserted funding for 21 earmarks for R&D construction at non-federal institutions into the appropriation of the General Services Administration which normally provides only for construction of federal office buildings. The Veterans-HUD subcommittees appear to have made more earmarks than usual for EPA and for the first time made a few for NASA, in its construction account. It is not clear whether earmarking is on the rise in the Agriculture and Interior subcommittees or if the FY 1991 earmarks are simply a continuation of their normal practices. 4) Impacts: In general it can be said that any earmarks within a constrained total put a corresponding squeeze on the agency's overall program. But it is a matter of speculation, or at least for specific inquiry in each case, whether if the earmarks had not been made, more money would have been made available for the R&D programs proposed in the budget. The budgetary impacts of Congressional action on R&D programs can be the combined result of three factors: (1) specific reductions or increases in the program as proposed, (2) squeezes by general reductions in appropriations, and (3) squeezes by earmarks of many sorts, including earmarks for technical programs or disciplines and for non-R&D programs, as well as the institution/location earmarks discussed in this report. Analysis of our data cannot isolate the impact of these earmarks from other factors, but it can indicate some areas of greater or lesser apparent impact. The figures in Table II enable one to compare, for each program area, the amounts earmarked with the net change made by Congress in the FY 1991 budget. To the extent Congress has provided a net increase over the budget for R&D, the squeeze has been applied elsewhere in the budget and the earmarks can be said to have been covered by "new money." To the extent that increases fall short of the amounts earmarked, and in all cases where Congress has reduced the budget, the impact is a squeeze on the R&D budget which the agency will have to find ways to absorb. On this basis, R&D earmarks totaling $283.1 million appear to have been covered with "new money" in the cases of Defense Agencies' RDT&E, DOE Fossil Fuels, NOAA, Interior, HHS, GSA, and the "all other CSRS" category in Agriculture. Earmarks totalling $403.4 million in DOE Energy Supply R&D, EPA, and Agriculture appear to have been partially covered by $208.9 million in budget increases, so that the squeeze on them could be as little as $194.5 million. In the few cases where earmarks were made in programs reduced by Congress, such as in RDT&E in the three military departments and NASA construction, the squeeze will be the full amount of the earmarks. In total, by this analysis, the impact on R&D budgets of the $809.6 million of earmarks will be squeezes totaling at least $332.0 million. The squeezes will be greater to the extent that agencies with budget increases are not able to apply the increases as offsets to their earmarks, and could be less to the extent they are able to accept earmarked items as adequate substitutes for programs in the budget. From all indications, the most serious budgetary impacts would appear to be in the DOE programs budgeted under Energy Supply R&D, in the Agricultural Research Service and the Forest Service. In the other cases the earmarked amounts are a relatively small percent of the total available and can probably be absorbed without serious dislocations. Direct discussions with the responsible officials in the agencies would be necessary to assess the actual impacts in each case. D. Implications and Concerns 1) There are likely to be more rather than fewer R&D earmarks for institutions and locations in future years. Their natural political appeal, the precedents set this year, and the absence of disincentives to Congress point to continued and perhaps expanded use of earmarks, both for new projects and to protect existing projects threatened by overall budget limitations. Establishment of an enlarged formal competitive program for academic research facilities, as has been suggested, might take some pressure off Congress for direct appropriations, but could also whet Congressional interest in participating in or supplementing the allocation process. 2) The FY 1991 earmarks include about 25 cases where it is indicated that new centers, institutes, or other entities are to be established. In most (not all) of these cases continued federal support in future years seems clearly implied. Most of the operations earmarks also imply continuing support in future years. Thus this year's earmarks have put a built-in squeeze on future year budgets, an effect that will be compounded as additional earmarks are made each year. 3) Over half of the 28 DOD earmarks are for initiatives in broad technology, manufacturing, and other areas that appear to be responses to general national economic and other concerns perhaps more than to identified DOD needs. Granting a valid DOD interest in advanced technology, and some of the other areas, one can still question whether the DOD budget should become the vehicle for federal support in these areas, especially through the random operation of the earmarking process. Attachment Tables I, II and III TABLE I CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ON R&D IN THE FY 1991 BUDGET Summary (in millions) 90 91 by 91 Cong. Agency Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks Defense 37,864.8 39,171.8 -2,200.4 36,971.4 253.4 Energy 7,162.4 7,382.7 +2.8 7,385.5 185.5 Commerce 439.3 459.1 +28.0 487.1 14.4 Interior 521.5 498.5 +72.1 570.6 17.5 EPA 431.0 479.2 +61.1 540.3 66.9 Health & Human Serv. 8,582.8 9,029.8 +433.5 9,463.3 3.4 Education 162.0 164.7 -.8 163.9 7.6 NASA 7,231.8 9,259.8 -1,069.4 8,190.4 18.0 NSF 1,885.2 2,135.9 -127.8 2,008.1 - Smithsonian 93.0 105.0 -1.3 103.7 - General Services Admin. NA -0- +60.7 60.7 60.7 Agriculture 1,226.0 1,287.0 +129.4 1,416.4 182.2 Housing & Urban Dev. 19.5 47.1 -19.5 27.6 - Transportation 360.3 439.3 +21.0 460.3 - Veterans 220.2 206.2 +18.3 224.5 - All Other 534.2 532.9 -0- 532.9 - TOTAL 66,734.0 71,199.0 -2,592.3 68,606.7 809.6 TABLE II CONGRESSIONAL ACTION ON R&D IN THE FY 1991 BUDGET Detail by Major Identifiable Programs (in millions) Agency & 90 91 by 91 Cong. Program Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks Defense RDT&E, Army 5,354.5 6,025.9 -418.5 5,607.4 6.1 RDT&E, Navy 9,739.2 9,102.4 -64.7 9,037.7 44.9 RDT&E, Air Force 13,635.6 13,276.3 -1,315.0 11,961.3 37.9 RDT&E, Defense Ag: SDIO 3,573.0 4,195.0 -1,305.0 2,890.0 - Other 4,540.0 5,054.3 +1,171.4 6,225.7 164.5 Dev T&E + Op T&E 190.9 +38.9 -186.2 252.7 - Total RDT&E Accounts 37,033.2 38,092.8 -2,118.0 35,974.8 253.4 RDT&E, Chem Agts. Des. 8.0 -0- +5.3 5.3 - RDT&E, Drug Interdict. 10.4 20.3 +27.4 47.7 - Mil. Construc. R&D Items NA 286.7 -93.1 193.6 - Total Iden. R&D 37,051.6 38,399.8 -2,178.4 36,221.4 253.4 Adj to OMB basis 813.2 772.0 -22.0 750.0 - TOTAL DOD R&D 37,864.8 39,171.8 -2,200.4 36,971.4 253.4 Energy Fossil Fuels 344.7 167.1 +221.0 388.1 11.6 Clean Coal - 100.0 -65.0 35.0 - Energy Conservation 191.2 182.6 -46.3 228.9 7.4 Ener. Supp. Res. Dev. 1,796.7 1,922.9 +50.6 1,973.5 166.5 Gen. Science & Res. 1,098.8 1,273.7 -125.0 1,148.7 - Natl. Def. Activities 2,718.1 2,710.6 -125.1 2,585.5 - Total Iden. R&D 6,149.5 6,356.9 +2.8 6,359.7 185.5 Adj to OMB basis 1,012.9 1,025.8 -0- 1,025.8 - TOTAL DOE R&D 7,162.4 7,382.7 +2.8 7,385.5 185.5 2 Agency & 90 91 by 91 Cong. Program Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks Commerce NOAA 250.9 273.4 +26.4 299.8 13.4 NIST 144.4 164.6 +1.6 166.2 - Total Iden. R&D 395.3 438.0 +28.0 466.0 13.4 Adj to OMB basis +44.0 +21.1 -0- 21.1 1.0 TOTAL DOC R&D 439.3 459.1 +28.0 487.1 14.4 Interior USGS 283.5 305.2 +28.3 333.5 .1 Bur. of Mines 111.2 78.0 +34.2 112.2 14.1 Fish & Wildlife 70.9 69.1 +9.6 78.7 3.3 Total Iden. R&D 465.6 452.3 +72.1 524.4 17.5 Adj to OMB basis +55.9 +46.2 -0- +46.2 - TOTAL DOI R&D 521.5 498.5 +72.1 570.6 17.5 EPA Research & Develop. 229.8 249.0 +5.9 254.9 9.3 Adj to OMB basis 201.2 230.2 +55.2 285.4 57.6 TOTAL EPA R&D 431.0 479.2 +61.1 540.3 656.9 3 Agency & 90 91 by 91 Cong. Program Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks Health & Human Services NIH 7,289.7 7,636.4 +364.0 8,000.4 - ADAMHA 741.9 813.2 +52.8 866.0 - CDC-NIOSH 74.2 74.7 +12.8 87.5 - Policy Research 5.0 5.0 +3.9 8.9 3.2 Total Iden. R&D 8,110.8 8,529.3 +433.5 8,962.8 3.2 Adj to OMB basis 472.0 500.5 -0- 500.5 .2 TOTAL HHS R&D 8,582.8 9,029.8 +433.5 9,463.3 3.4 Education Research Eval. etc. 50.6 61.3 -.8 60.5 - Adj to OMB basis 111.4 103.4 & 103.4 7.6 TOTAL DEd R&D 162.0 164.7 -.8 163.9 7.6 NASA Research & Develop. 5,227.8 7,074.0 -1,041.4 6,032.6 - Adj to OMB basis 2,004.0 2,185.8 -28.0 2,157.8 18.0 TOTAL NASA R&D 7,231.8 9,259.8 -1,069.4 8,190.4 18.0 4 Agency & 90 91 by 91 Cong. Program Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks NSF Research & Rel. Act. 1,702.4 1,954.0 -249.3 1,704.7 - Program Dev. & Man - - +101.0 101.0 - Academic Res. Fac. 19.7 - +20.5 20.5 - US Antarctica Prog. 72.0 100.0 -0- 100.0 - Total Iden. R&D 1,774.4 2,054.0 -127.8 1,926.2 - Adj to OMB basis 110.8 81.9 -0- 81.9 - TOTAL NSF R&D 1,885.2 2,135.9 -127.8 2,008.1 - Smithsonian Research 43.8 51.0 -1.3 49.7 - Const.-R&D Items 1.9 1.6 - 1.6 - Total Iden. R&D 45.7 52.6 -1.3 51.3 - Adj to OMB basis 47.3 52.4 - 52.4 - TOTAL Smithsonian R&D 93.0 105.0 -1.3 103.7 - General Services Admin. New Const.-R&D Items NA -0- +60.7 60.7 60.7 5 Agency & 90 91 by 91 Cong. Program Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks Agriculture Agricultural Res. Serv. 596.8 656.1 +9.0 665.1 28.4 Cooperative State Res. 337.7 346.9 +41.6 388.5 53.6 Special Grants (55.8) (25.6) (+36.4) (62.0) (41.4) Competing Grants (42.5) (100.0) (-27.0) (73.0) (-) All other CSRS Res. (239.4) (221.3) (+32.2) (253.5) (12.2) Buildings & Fac.(CSRS) 45.1 -0- +62.9 62.9 62.9 Forest Service 145.2 148.7 +17.8 166.5 37.3 Economic Res. Serv. 50.6 56.3 -1.9 54.4 - Total Iden. R&D 1,175.4 1,208.0 +129.4 1,337.4 182.2 Adj to OMB basis +50.6 +79.0 -0- +79.0 - TOTAL USDA R&D 1,226.0 1,287.0 +129.4 1,416.4 182.2 Housing & Urban Devel. Research & Technology 20.4 23.0 +5.5 28.5 - Adj to OMB basis -.9 +24.1 -25.0 -.9 - TOTAL HUD R&D 19.5 47.1 -19.5 27.6 - Transportation FAA Res. Eng. & Dev. 170.2 190.0 +15.0 206.0 - Coast Guard RDT&E 20.5 23.0 +2.0 25.0 - Railroad R&D 9.5 17.0 +5.1 22.1 - FHA Highway Saf R&D 6.1 5.5 - 5.5 - Transp. Planning R&D 6.7 4.0 -1.1 2.9 - Total Iden. R&D 213.0 239.5 -21.0 260.5 - Adj to OMB basis 147.3 199.8 -0- 199.8 - TOTAL DOT R&D 360.3 439.3 +21.0 460.3 6 Agency & 90 91 by 91 Cong. Program Comp. Budget Congress Cong. Earmarks Veterans Medical & Prosth. Res. 212.7 198.5 +18.3 216.8 - Adj to OMB Basis 7.5 7.7 & 7.7 - TOTAL DVA R&D 220.2 206.2 +18.3 224.5 - Totals Above R&D Identified 61,122.6 65,336.2 -2,572.5 62,763.7 725.2 Adj to OMB basis 5,077.2 5,329.9 -19.8 5,310.1 84.4 Total R&D 66,199.8 70,666.1 -2,592.3 68,073.8 809.6 Other Agencies R&D 534.2 532.9 -0- 532.9 -0- GRAND TOTAL R&D 66,734.0 71,199.0 -2,592.3 68,606.7 809.6 National Defense R&D DOE Natl Def Act R&D 2,718.1 2,710.6 -125.1 2,585.5 - Adj to OMB basis 461.2 609.9 -0- 609.9 - Natl Def R&D, DOE 3,179.3 3,320.5 -125.1 3,195.4 - Total DOD R&D 37,864.8 39,171.8 -2,200.4 36,971.4 253.4 TOTAL NATL DEF R&D 41,044.1 42,492.3 -2,325.5 40,166.8 253.4 NON DEFENSE R&D 25,689.9 28,706.7 -266.8 28,439.9 556.2 GRAND TOTAL R&D 66,734.0 71,199.0 -2,592.3 68,606.7 809.6 , , TABLE III CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS OF R&D ITEMS FOR SPECIFIC INSTITUTIONS OR LOCATIONS BY 1991 APPROPRIATIONS A - - BY AGENCY (in millions) Facilities Operations Total In Repts. Agency No. Amt. No. Amt. No. Amt. Law Only Defense 8 106.5 20 146.9 28 253.4 16 12 Energy 15 104.1 33 81.4 48 185.5 16 32 Commerce 2 3.0 12 11.4 14 14.4 4 10 Interior 2 .8 23 16.7 25 17.5 - 25 EPA 4 37.2 16 29.7 20 66.9 1 19 HHS 1 .2 1 3.2 2 3.4 1 1 Education - - 5 7.6 5 7.6 5 - NASA 4 18.0 - - 4 18.0 1 3 NSF - - - - - - - - Smithsonian - - - - - - - - GSA 21 60.7 - - 21 60.7 21 - Agriculture 54 97.0 271 85.2 325 182.2 - 325 TOTAL 111 427.5 381 382.1 492 809.6 65 427 2 B - BY SUBCOMMITTEE (in millions) Subcommittee Facilities Operations Total In Repts. & Agency No. Amt. No. Amt. No. Amt. Law Only Defense: Defense 8 106.5 20 146.9 28 253.4 16 12 Energy & Water Res: Energy (part) 15 104.1 18 62.4 33 166.5 11 22 Commerce, Justice, State, Etc.: Commerce 2 3.0 12 11.4 14 14.4 4 10 Interior & Rel Agen: Interior (2) (.8) (23) (16.7) (25) (17.5) - (25) Energy (part) - - (15) (19.0) (15) (19.0) (5) (10) Agri. Forest Serv. (5) (17.1) (88) (20.2) (93) (37.3) - (93) Total 7 17.9 126 55.9 133 73.8 5 128 Veterans, HUD-Ind: EPA (4) (37.2) (16) (29.7) (20) (66.9) (1) (19) NASA (4) (18.0) - - (4) (18.0) (1) (3) NSF - - - - - - - - Total 8 55.2 16 29.7 24 84.9 2 22 Labor, HHS, Educ.: HHS (1) (.2) (1) (3.2) (2) (3.4) (1) (1) Education - - (5) (7.6) (5) (7.6) (5) - Total 1 .2 6 10.8 7 11.0 6 1 Treasury, Post Off.: GSA 21 60.7 - - 21 60.7 21 - Agriculture: Agriculture (part) 49 79.9 183 65.0 232 144.9 - 232 TOTAL 111 427.5 381 382.1 492 809.6 65 427 CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS OF R&D ITEMS FOR SPECIFIC INSTITUTIONS OR LOCATIONS FY 1991 APPROPRIATIONS Agencies Page Department of Defense 1 Department of Energy 6 Department of Commerce 12 Department of the Interior 14 Environmental Protection Agency 17 Department of Health & Human Services 20 Department of Education 21 National Aeronautics and Space Administration 22 National Science Foundation 23 Smithsonian Institution 23 General Services Administration 23 Department of Agriculture 26 CONGRESSIONAL EARMARKS OF R&D ITEMS FOR SPECIFIC INSTITUTIONS OR LOCATIONS FY 1991 APPROPRIATIONS (Amounts in Millions; L = in law, R = in report(s) only; H, S, C = House, Senate, Conference Report for the applicable Appropriations Bill--see citations in Appendix B; * = Facilities item) Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE RD T&E Army: 1. Dev. & implement "Rapid Letterkenny Army PA 3.2 R H-194 Acquisition of Spare Parts" Depot (RASP) 2. Environmental Quality Natick Res. Dev. MA 2.9 R C-102 Technology & Eng. Cntr. RD T&E Navy: 3. Grant to continue R&D at Mississippi Resource MS 1.0 L C-104 Natl. Cntr. for Physical Development Corp. Acoustics" on ocean acoustics, etc. 4. For "Competitive Technologies, Lehigh University PA 24.0 L C-104 Inc." for efforts on ship- building design, etc. 1 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 5. Grant to Univ. of Hawaii U.H., Manoa HI 6.0 L C-9 6. Grant to Univ. of Utah U.U., Utah UT 8.9 L C-9 7. For a "Cntr. of Excellence Not specified ? 5.0 R C-107 in Composites Mfg. Tech. 8. Allocate full amt. requested Not identified ? ? R H-181 for Naval Biodynamics Lab (NBDL) 9. Forbid reducing annual work- Boston MA ? R H-181 load at Naval Blood Research Lab RD T&E, Air Force: 10. For the "Natl. Cntr. for Not identified ? 30.0 L H-217, Manufacturing Sciences" C-112 program in House Auth. Rpt. 11. For establishing a "Cntr. for Toledo OH 5.0 R H-217 Tool & Die Manufacture" 12. For continued support of the Not identified ? 2.9 R H-217, "Cntr. of Excellence for C-112 Adv. Flexible Mfg. Syst." 2 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref RD T&E Def. Agencies: "University Research Init." earmarks: *13. Grant or Contract with a univ. Not specified ? 18.0 L H-222-3, for a facility for collaborative C-116 med. research & training of military personnel 14. Grant to establish an "Institute Not specified ? 10.0 L C-10, for Technology & Adv. Res." at C-114 an institution of higher ed. *15. Grant for facilities & equip- U. of Scranton PA 10.0 L C-10-11, ment for "Center for Technology C-114 & Applied Research" *16. For a facility under the College Drake Univ. IA 10.0 L H-223, of Pharmacy & Health Sciences C-114 17. For establishment of a "Materials Not specified ? 5.0 L H-223, Research Center" C-114 *18. Grant to complete the "Center Loyola College ? 3.5 L H-223, for Advanced Information & C-115 Resource Management" 19. Est. by DoD of an "Experimental Various ? 7.0 L H-223, Program to Stimulate Competitive C-114 Research" (EPSCoR) 3 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref "Research Projects" earmarks: 20. For establishment of a "Coal Universities TBD ? 5.0 L H-229, Utilization Cntr." with DOE C-119 and "at least one univ." 21. For a grant to the "Liberty Not identified ? 15.0 L H-229, Science Center" C-119 *22. For an "Environmental & Not specified ? 20.0 R C-119 Molecular Sciences Lab" (EMSL) Other earmarks: 23. Grant to the "Advanced Stevens Inst. of Tech. NJ 6.0 L C-11 Manufacturing Institute" *24. Grant from "Defense Research South Carolina Research SC 10.0 L C-11 Sciences" funds to construct, Authority equip, & operate a ferrochromium processing facility 25. Support for "Natl. Defense Natl. Def. Environmental ? 5.0 R H-72 Center for Environ. Excellence Corporation *26. Establishment of an "Arctic "An institution engaged AK 25.0 R S-235, region supercomputing center" in DoD research located C-119 for research on "the issue of within the Arctic region" global environmental change" 4 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref *27. For a "Critical Technology Not specified ? 5.0 R S-235, Institute" to assist OSTP C-116 *28. Secy of Defense "to give high Not specified ? 10.0 R S-226 priority" to construction of a lab for univ. research and accessible by a number of com- panies "to develop manufacturing ability in advanced materials" TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, DoD 253.4 In Law (L) (169.4) In Reports only (R) (84.0) 5 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Fossil Fuels R&D: 1. Grant to the "Natl. Res. Not identified ? 2.5 L C-13&63 Cntr. for Coal & Energy" 2. Matching grant for "Univ. Not specified ND 2.0 L C-13&63 of North Dakota Energy & Environmental Res. Cntr." (UNDEERC) 3. Alcohol catalysts project Morgantown WVA 1.0 R C-61 by West Virginia Univ. jointly with industry 4. Oil recovery technology by NM .5 R C-61 New Mexico Tech & Stanford and Stanford CA 5. Purchase supercomputer time Las Vegas NE 1.82 R C-62 from Univ of Nevada-Las Vegas 6. For the Historically Black Not specified ? .5 R C-62 Colleges for university coal research 7. Tar sands research at the Salt Lake City (?) UT 1.0 R S-118, Univ. of Utah C-60 6 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 8. Hawaiian energy study Not specified HI .75 R S-114, C-60 9. Existing coop. program at Champaign (?) IL 1.5 R H-117 the Univ. of Illinois Energy Conservation R&D: 10. Est. of a "Natl. Metal Casting IA 1.0 L C-14&64 Res. Institute" at the Univ. of Northern Iowa 11. Est. of a "Natl. Metal Casting AL 1.0 L C-14&64 Res. Institute" at the Univ. of Alabama 12. Grant to the "Natl. Cntr. for Not identified ? 2.25 L C-14&65 Alternative Transportation Fuels" 13. "For the Univ. of Oregon and OR 1.5 R C-64 Florida Solar Energy Center FL consortium" industrialized housing program 14. Hawaiian methanol fuels program Not specified HI 1.5 R C-64 15. For "an energy efficient design Not identified OR .175 R C-64 at the Oregon Art Institute 7 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref Energy Supply Research & Development: (Law earmarks $89,842,500 for facilities See below - 89.8 L C-83 items #16 through #25 below) *16. Advanced Technology Center Indiana State Univ. IN (4.8) L C-83 *17. Center for Energy Resources Univ. of New Orleans LA (10.0) L C-83 Management *18. Biomedical Res. Facility, Birmingham AL (10.0) L C-83 Univ. of Alabama *19. Biomedical Res. Facility, Cleveland OH (10.0) L C-83 Case Western Reserve Univ. *20. Energy Science Res. Facility Boston College MA (10.0) L C-83 *21. Center for Nuclear Med. Res. West. Virginia Univ. WVA (10.0) L C-83 *22. Gazes Cardiac Res. Inst., Charleston SC (6.0) L C-83 Med. Univ. of South Carolina *23. Biomed. Res. Institute, LSU Shreveport LA (12.5) L C-83 *24. Neurosensory Res. Cntr., OR (12.5) L C-83 Oregon Health Sciences Univ. *25. Physical Sciences Cntr., Fort Hays KA (4.0) L C-83 Fort Hays State Univ. 8 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 26. "Natl. Inst. of Global Univ. of Calif, Davis? CA 9.0 R C-85 Environmental Change" 27. Boron Neutron Capture Therapy INEL ID 5.5 R C-84 at the Idaho Natl. Eng. Lab. 28. Mod & Op. of Power Burst Fac. INEL ID 7.5 R C-84 at the Idaho Natl. Eng. Lab. 29. Wind energy research at the Univ. of MA, Amherst MA 1.5 R C-84 Renewable Energy Res. Cntr., Univ. of Massachusetts 30. Ocean Energy Res. funds for Org. set up by Hawaii HI 2.25 R C-84 "PICHTR-OTEC" 31. DOE EPSCoR planning grants TBD - 2.0 R C-86 32. DOE EPSCoR grad. traineeships TBD - 2.0 R C-86 33. For tech. transfer demonstrations Not specified OK .2 R C-86 by "Rural Enterprises, Inc." 34. "Supercomputer Computation FL (= FY 90 R C-86-7 Res. Institute" at Florida St. Univ. amt) 35. Geothermal res., State of Hawaii HI 5.0 R S-81 36. Geothermal resource evaluation Oregon Inst. of Tech. OR 1.5 R S-81 proposed by 3 organizations Univ. of Utah Res. Inst. UT Idaho Water Res. Res. Inst. ID 9 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref *37. Further planning of proposed West Virginia Univ. WVA .25 R S-89 res. cntr. in basic sci. of materials by design *38. Cost share with Diagnostic MS 4.0 R S-89 Instrumen. & Analysis Lab. at Miss. State Univ. 39. Center for Energy & Env. Educ. IA 4.0 R S-90 at Univ. of Northern Iowa *40. Assist Clark Atlanta Univ. to Atlanta GA not spec. R S-91 complete res. cntr. for sci. & tech. 41. Adv. Tech. Res. Cntr., Oklahoma OK 5.0 R H-? 42. Nebraska Cntr. for Sci. & Tech. NE 5.7 R H-? 43. Jackson State Univ coop. prog. ? 2.5 R H-? with LBL & Mendez Foundation 44. Purdue University IN 3.0 R H-? 45. Cntr. of Excellence, Materials Not identified ? 5.0 R S-? 46. Louisiana Tech. Univ., Eng. Res. LA .75 R S-? *47. PET equip., Children's Hosp., Detroit MI 8.0 R H-? Detroit *48. 6-MEV accel. Misericordia Hosp. PA 2.1 R H-? 10 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref General Sciences & Research: No earmarks TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, DOE (185.5) In Law (L) (98.6) In Reports (R) (84.9) 11 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOAA: *1. Stuttgard Fish Farming Exp. Sta. Stuttgart AR 2.75 L S-23, C-13&19 2. Cont. of work at a semi-tropical Key Largo FL .4 L H-14, res. forest C-13&19 3. For Charleston Harbor Estuary South Carolina SC .4 L S-17, Special Area Management Plan Coastal Council C-13&19 4. Res. on high salinity estuaries Univ. of South Carolina SC .35 R S-21 and Baruch Institute 5. Res. & demo. on natural resources South Carolina Water SC .9 R S-21&22 information system Res. Comm. 6. Expand wetlands demo project So. Carolina Wildlife & SC .5 R S-22 Marine Res. Dept for Res. Surveys 7. So. Carolina Geodetics Survery Not identified SC .577 R S-21, C-14 8. "For the Gloucester Laboratories" Gloucester MA 1.46 R C-19 9. "Natl. Undersea Res. Prog." (NURP) "Inst. of Marine Coastal NJ 2.5 R C-19 Sciences," Rutgers Univ. 12 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 10. "Natl. Undersea Res. Prog." (NURP) Hawaii HI 2.5 R C-19 11. Weather modification research Arizona AZ .55 R H-15 *12. Facilities improvements, Beaufort NC .2 R H-16 Beaufort Lab 13. For cont. support of "Newport Newport OR .355 R S-23 Marine Science Center" TOTAL Earmarks, NOAA (13.442) Natl. Telecomm. & Info. Admin: 1. Pan-Pacific Educ. & Cult. Experi- Univ. of Hawaii HI 1.0 L S-33, ments by Satellite (PEACESAT) C-24 Nat. Inst. of Standards & Tech.: No items TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, DOC (14.442) In Law (L) (4.55) In Reports only (R) (9.892) 13 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR USGS: 1. Operate water qual. monitoring Alsek River AK .078 R S-44, station on Alsek River, AK C-35 TOTAL Earmarks, USGS (.078) Bureau of Mines: 1. Continue "respirable dust res." West Virginia Univ. WVA 2.5 R S-49 at 4 universities Penn. State Univ. PA Univ. of Minnesota MN MIT MA 2. "Rockburst research" Spokane Res. Cntr. WA 2.0 R S-49 3. Testing & dev. of automated Spokane Res. Cntr. WA .75 R S-49 and robotic system *4. Equipment upgrade Spokane Res. Cntr. WA .675 R S-49 5. Strategic & critical minerals Idaho Natl. Eng. Lab. ID 2.5 R S-50, res. (2 items) C-37 6. Hazardous mine waste tech. res. Spokane Res. Cntr. WA 1.0 R S-50 14 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 7. Hazardous mine waste tech. res. Univ. of Idaho ID .5 R S-50 8. Res. in soil revegetation with Soil Not identified AR .25 R S-50, Conservation Service in Arkansas C-37 9. For continuing "Mine Land Not identified ? NA H-55, Reclamation Cntr." work "at S-50 current funding levels" 10. Mine remediation, Mine Hill, NJ Mine Hill NJ .21 R H-55 11. Mine remediation, North Arlington NJ 1.4 R H-55, North Arlington, NJ S-50 12. "Marine Minerals Tech. Cntr." Not identified ? 1.3 R H-55 13. Oregon metals research initiative Not identified OR 1.0 R H-54 TOTAL Earmarks, Bureau of Mines (14.085) Fish & Wildlife Service: 1. North Carolina Striped Bass Study Not identified NC .35 R H-23 2. "Monell Chemical Senses Cntr." Not identified ? .2 R H-23 3. "Sunderland Office of Fisheries Not identified CT? .075 R H-23 Assistance" 15 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 4. Inter. Cntr. for Preservation Not identified ? .125 R H-23, of Animals C-25 5. Woodland Park Zoo Seattle WA .250 R H-23 6. Aquaculture res "at Gadsen Not identified AL .3 R H-23 Junior College in Alabama" 7. For "the Southeastern Fish Not identified ? 1.2 R H-23 Culture Lab" 8. Zebra mussel research, Not identified WI? .5 R H-24 "La Crosse Lab" 9. Zebra mussell research, Steubenville OH .15 R H-24 "Steubenville, OH, fac." *10. Transfer of Victoria field sta. College Station TX .15 R S-17 to Texas A&M 11. Maintain level of res. at "Pacific ? -- R S-17 NW Res. Station" TOTAL Earmarks Fish & Wildlife Serv. (3.3) TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, DOI (17.463) In Reports only (R) (17.463) 16 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Research and Development: 1. For the Cntr. for Environmental Not identified ? 3.15 R C-31 Management 2. Coop. prog. with Nat. Resources Not identified ? 4.0 R C-31 Institute's Minerals Res. Lab. 3. For a Denver water re-use Denver CO .5 R C-31 demonstration project 4. Exp. prog. to stimulate Various -- 1.0 R C-31 competitive research (EPSCoR) 5. For the Inst. for Environmental LA .4 R C-31 Issues & Policy Assessment at Southern Univ. of Louisiana 6. Res. on termites, Louisiana LA .2 R C-31 State University Abatement, Control & Compliance: 7. Lake Pontchartrain demons. proj. LA .275 R C-32 *8. New EPA Cntr. for Ecology Bay City MI 9.7 L C-32&34 Research & Training 17 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 9. Waste management program at Latrobe PA .575 R C-32 St. Vincent College 10. Pesticide program with East Lansing MI .125 R C-33 Michigan State University 11. Two State of New Jersey Trenton (?) NJ .45 R C-33 recycling projects 12. For the "Water Pollution Control Not identified ? .5 R C-33 Federation Research Foundation" Buildings and Facilities: *13. For the Ann Arbor Mobile Ann Arbor MI 21.0 R C-34 Vehicle Emissions Lab & fac. *14. Christopher Columbus Cntr. of Baltimore MD 6.0 R C-34 Marine Research & Exploration *15. For the Robert S. Kerr Ada OK .5 R C-35 Environmental Research Lab. Superfund: 16. For the Natl. Inst. for Not identified ? 10.0 R C-35 Environmental Health Sciences 18 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 17. For Superfund res. at Clark Atlanta GA 2.0 R C-35 Atlanta University 18. Pilot prog. for treating mining Butte MT 3.5 R C-35 waste 19. For the Energy & Environmental ND .495 R C-35 Research Cntr. at the Univ. of North Dakota 20. For the Gulf Coast Hazardous Beaumont TX 2.5 R C-35 Substances Res. Cntr. TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, EPA (66.87) In Law (L) (9.7) In Reports only (R) (57.17) 19 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food & Drug Administration: *1. Study of need for a clinical res. Pittsburgh PA .2 R H-122, fac. at Children's Hospital C-30 Office of Science Policy Research: 2. Continue res. on poverty at the Not identified ? 3.15 L C-30 "Inst. for Research on Poverty" TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFED, DHHS (3.35) In Law (L) (3.15) In Reports only (R) (.2) 20 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Special Grants: 1. John McCormack Institute ? MA 2.928 L 2. Margaret Chase Smith Library ? ME .976 L Endowment 3. Magnuson Endowment ? WA 2.928 L 4. Taft Institute ? OH .683 L 5. Assistance to Guam GU .48 L TOTAL EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, DOEd (7.563) In Law (L) (7.563) 21 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION *1. Visitor Center, Johnson Space Clear Lake TX 10.0 L C-45&46 Center *2. Wake Shield Facility Houston TX 3.0 R S-124, C-46 *3. "Classroom of the Future," at WVA 4.0 R S-145, Shepherd College, West Virginia C-46 *4. Planning for facilities for the Saginaw (?) MI 1.0 R H-?, "Consortium for Inter. Earth C-46 Science Infor. Networks" (CIESIN) TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, NASA (18.0) In Law (L) (10.0) In Reports only (R) (8.0) 22 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION No earmarks for specific institutions -- -- (0.0) -- -- or locations identified SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION No earmarks for specific institutions -- -- (0.0) -- -- or locations identified GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION New Construction: *1. Univ. of Idaho Environmental Moscow ID 5.8 L C-69 Lab. *2. Pittsburg State Univ. School Pittsburgh PA 5.0 L C-69 of Technology *3. Univ. of Maryland super- College Park MD 1.375 L C-69 conducting materials res. *4. Brandeis Univ. Natl. Cntr. for Waltham MA 4.0 L C-69 Complex Systems *5. Michigan Tech. Univ. Cntr. for Houghton MI 1.75 L C-69 Applied Metallurgical, Minerals & Materials Res. 23 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref *6. Rochester Inst. of Technology, Rochester NY 1.75 L C-70 Strategic Materials Res. Cntr. *7. El Paso Univ. of Texas El Paso TX 1.0 L C-70 *8. Woods Hole Marine Biol. Lab. Woods Hole MA 4.75 L C-69 Marine Biomedical Institute *9. Grant to Loyola University Marymount CA 4.0 L C-68 *10. Grant for planning & designing Baltimore MD 4.0 L C-69 the Christopher Columbus Cntr. on Marine Res. & Exploration *11. Primate Research Institute Holloman AFB NM 4.0 L C-70 *12. Texas A&M for est. of the Inst. College Station TX 1.75 L for Natl. Drug Alternative Res. *13. Southwest Forestry Science Flagstaff AZ 4.5 L C-68 Complex, No. Arizona Univ. *14. California State University East Los Angeles CA .35 L C-68 *15. Natl. Res. Cntr. for Environ- Denver CO 1.0 L C-68 mental Lung Disease *16. Dean Rusk Cntr. for Inter. and Athens GA 1.0 L C-68 Comp. Law, Univ. of Georgia *17. Midwest Supercomputer Ames Ames IA 2.2 L C-69 Cntr., Iowa State Univ. 24 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref *18. McLaughlin Res. Inst. for Great Falls MT 5.0 L C-69 Biomedical Sciences *19. Geo. W. Beadle Cntr. for Genetic Lincoln NE 4.5 L C-69 & Biomaterials Res. *20. Criss Research Building, Omaha NE 2.0 L C-69 Creighton Univ. *21. Center for Disease Prevention, New York NY 1.0 L C-69 Columbia Univ. TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, GSA (60.725) In Law (L) (60.725) 25 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE Agricultural Research Service: 1. Research: 57 items listed in Various -- 11.49 R C-8&9 Appendix A-1 *2. Building & Facilities: 13 items Various -- 16.966 R C-9 listed in Appendix A-1 Cooperative State Research Service: 3. Special Grants: 110 items listed Various -- 41.4 R C-11&12 in Appendix A-2 4. Critical Agricultural Materials Res.: a) for "Natl. Cntr. for Not identified ? .5 R C-13 Physical Acoustics"; b) for Polymer Cntr. at the Univ. MS .3 R C-13 of Southern Mississippi 5. Op. of Inter. Trade Development Various -- 3.152 R C-13 Cntr.: 6 items listed in Appendix A-3 6. Federal Administration of CSRS: Various -- 8.32 R C-14 8 items listed in Appendix A-3 26 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref *7. CSRS Buildings & Facilities: Various -- 62.867 R C-15&16 36 items listed in Appendix A-3 [Note--Only earmarks in "Competitive Grants" are for areas of research] Subtotal Earmarks, ARS & CSRS (144.955) U.S. Forest Service: Forest Protection Research: 9. The 15 locations listed in Various -- 3.3 R H-88 Appendix A-4 10. Eastside forest research Bend OR .1 R C-48 11. Silviculture research Bozeman MT .15 R C-48 12. Southern pine disease research Gulfport MS .2 R C-49 13. Insect & forest decline research Hamden CT .268 R C-49 14. Root disease Moscow ID .1 R C-49 15. Pest impact assessment Research Triangle Park NC .195 R C-49 27 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref Resource Analysis Research: 16. The 12 locations listed in Various -- 3.7 R H-89 Appendix A-4 17. Cultural resources research Albuquerque NM .15 R C-49 18. For "inventory" St. Paul MN .15 R C-49 Timber Management Research: 19. The 11 locations listed in Various -- 3.4 R H-89 Appendix A-4 20. Silviculture research Boise ID .182 R C-49 21. Reforestation research Corvallis OR .1 R C-49 22. White spruce research Fairbanks AK .15 R C-49 23. Alt. management research Monticello AR .3 R C-49 24. Genetic adaptability Moscow ID .05 R C-49 25. Southern pine genetics Normal AL .22 R C-49 26. Spruce fir research Orono ME .253 R C-49 27. Soil productivity research Research Triangle Park NC .211 R C-49 28 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref 28. Southern forest productivity Not specified ? .35 R C-49 grants 29. Multiple use evaluation St. Paul MN .147 R C-49 30. New perspectives in forestry, OR .45 R C-49 H.J. Andrews Exp. Station Forest Environment Research: 31. The 16 locations listed in Various -- 3.1 R H-90 Appendix A-4 32. Forest environmental research Boise ID .2 R C-49 33. COPE/integrated resources Corvallis OR .1 R C-49 research 34. Tropical forestry Honolulu HI .124 R C-49 35. Fish habitat research Juneau AK .05 R C-49 36. Elk/deer/timber research LaGrande OR .05 R C-49 37. Snow hydrology research Laramie WY .05 R C-49 38. Rangeland mgmt. research Pineville LA .2 R C-49 39. Riparian zones research Rapid City SD .1 R C-49 29 Item Location State Amount L/R Ref Forest Products & Harvesting Research: 40. The 5 locations listed in Various -- 1.5 R H-91 Appendix A-4 41. Timber bridges Madison WI .3 R C-49 42. Earmarks for West Virginia Univ. Morgantown WVA .25 R C-50 out of total funds for timber bridges Construction: *43. Forest Serv. share of new res. Columbia MO 3.5 R H-104 facility at Univ. of Missouri &105 *44. Complete Pacific Southwest res. Not identified ? 1.0 R H-105 station headquarters *45. Improvements at H.J. Andrews OR 1.0 R H-105 Experiment Station *46. Forestry research lab. at AZ 10.0 R C-54 Northern Arizona University *47. Forestry lab. at Mississippi State MS 1.629 R C-54 Univ. Subtotal Earmarks, Forest Service (37.273) TOTAL R&D EARMARKS IDENTIFIED, doa (182.228) In Reports only (R) (182.228) 30 A-1 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE 91BUDGET Have ("II Senate Lill agreement '91 BUDGET agreement BASE BUNGET # 621,510 610,095 100 000 50000 Alternative fuels characterization lab (University of North (lahols) $300 000 (') b Manhaltan. AS 2 Animal health consortium, Aines. IA 170.000 $385 000 C Pullman, WA 100000 50000 100000 50 000 3 Aquaculture. Oceanic Institute. III $463,000 463.000 463.000 d largo, ND 900,000 450,000 17364000 - 4 Aquaculture, MV 54 Repair and maintenance 5 Beltsville modernization (transler from B&F) 1,250,000 Total (INCLUDES BASE) 621,510 631 208 000 612.495.000 1,585,000 6 BARC research, MD 500,000 250,000 1 Barley (Montana State University) 200,000 100.000 $250 000 provided under CSRS federal administration 8 Beckley. WV. conservation lab 300.000 150,000 $375,000 provided under CSRS. Federal administration STITEMS 9 Bee research ID. UI 100.000 50.000 House and Senate bills provided $300,000 under CSRS special good. 10 Center for lood salely and post harvest tech. MS 250,000 125.000 A total of $800 000 provided under CSRS. special grants BY:COM :*11,990,000 A total of $76.000 provided under CSRS. special grants II Meal animal research center. Clay Center, NE 500.00C 875,000 687,000 nate bell provided $17,364.000 under AHS. Buildings and Facilies 12 Dairy lorage. Pravie du Sac. WI 400,000 200,000 13 Eastein filbert blight. OR 50,000 85,000 67,000 14 Unspecified 7,550,000 15 Fermentation lab. Raleigh, NC 150.000 150000 16 lood safety (University of Arkansas) 400.000 200.000 11 fort Keogh livestock and lange lab. Miles City. MI 300 000 150,000 ARA BUILDINGS FACILITIES 18 Truit fly eradication. HI 900,000 900 000 900 000 19 Gypsy moth. BARC 500.000 250,000 20 Herd management (Tennessee State University) 750,000 (2) 21 Human nutrition (2000.000) (1,000,000) (1,500,000) I : Conference a Baylor. IX 500,000 300 000 '91Budget House Lill Senste bill 500.000 agreement b Beltsville MD 500.000 300.000 C Grand forks. ND 500,000 300,000 (1) (1) $223.00 d LAIR. CA 500 000 300.000 r I Arkansas Rice Research Center. Stuttgart e lults MA 500.000 300,000 2 California $5050.000 $5,050,000 5,050.00 (3) 2,690,000 (°) a US Salinity lab. Riverside (2) (² 22 Human nutrition. Pennington Center. IA 500.000 250.000 b US Water Management lab 4.0 2000000 4,000,000 3.000.00 23 Kearneysville. WV. truit lab 24 Locoweed Re earch NM 200 000 200.000 3 Colorado National Seed Storage Lab. fort Collins 200,000 2.5 300 000 7.000 3000 4 Georgia Poultry Disease lab. Alhens 25 Meadowfoam 5 Illinois: Northern Regional Research Center (2) (2, 26 New England plant. soil and water lab. Orono. ME 300,000 150,000 300 000 300 000 300 000 750.000 325.000 6 Iowa National Animal Disease Center. Ames 200 000 200.000 27 Northern Crops Institute 28 Northern plains soil and water lab. Sidney. MI 500.000 250,000 1 Idaho National Small Grains Germ Plasm Repository 8 Maryland: Beltsville Agricultural Research Center 16.0 ' 8,750 000 16000.000 16,000,000 300 000 300.000 29 Dats research a North Dakota State University 100 000 100.000 , Minnesola Soil and Water Lab. Morris b Aberdeen. Idaho 100,000 50.000 10 MIssissippi: (*) 5175000 5,175.00 200 000 a Center for Natural Products 30 Peach and pecan, Byron, GA 150,000 250.000 (3) 2,140,000 1,200,000 31 Peanut research (GA. NC. VA) 300,000 300.000 b National Center for Warm Water Aquaculture II North Dakota Plant science greenhouse complex NDSU 425 000 425 000 32 Pear thrips, VI 58.000 29,000 1,450,000 1 450 000 33 Plant stress research. lubbock IX 150.000 75,000 I 12 Oklahoma South Central Agricullural Research Center, Lane 168000 168 000 13 Oregon Columbia Basin Apricultural Research Center. Pendleton 34 Potato research 150.000 200 000 175.000 a Potato beetles 150.000 150.000 150.000 14 Oregon/Washinglom/ldaho Northwest Small fruit Center 5050 000 b Potato varieles 100,000 100,000 100.000 15 South Carolma US Vegetable Lab. Charleston 35 Red River Valley Agriculture Research Center. largo. ND 100.000 350.000 16 lexas 1 700 000 1,700 000 36 Rice research. LA 200,000 100.000 a AHS llee Lab. Weslaco 600 000 4,000000 600,000 b l'lant Sliess lab. Texas Tech University 37 Russian wheat aphid 400.000 200.000 11 Washington US Fruit and Vegetable Lab. Yakima 10.1 5050000 5,050,000 5,050,000 38 Scrapie/bovine spongilorm encephalopathy |BSE| 600,000 300.000 18 Miscellaneous Repair and improvement. ARS facilities 389.000 17,364,000 (*) 39 Sheep experiment station, Dubois, ID 500.000 250.000 40 Soybean research 350,000 700,000 525,000 32.6 26,039,000 65,122,000 41,016,000 Total 41 Soybean based ink 150,000 75.000 a Lehigh University 51.000 25.000 House bill and Senate bill included $223.000 under CSRS. Buildings and Facilities ALL ITEMS EXCEPT 42 Space remote sensing. MS 100 000 50.000 Report on need as specified in the House report 43 Special food 500 000 500 000 500.000 House bill included $1,250 000 under ARS repair and improvement House bill included $3,850.000 under CSRS. Buiklings and dities account NOS 348417 ADDEDBY 44 Sugarate research. III 200.000 12000 106,000 House M requested report en lacdities requirements 45 Sweel potate research 250 000 250.000 Conterence agreement includes $17,364,000 under ARS CONGRESS:*16,965,000 CONGRESS: 46 Sweel potato whitelly 100000 200 000 150 000 47 Systematic entomology lab. Beltsville MD 200 000 100.000 48 lurkey osteomyelitis complex 200.000 200 000 200.000 49 Urban pests (University of Georgia) 153.000 (a) 50 Urban pests. Gainesville 100,000 100.000 51 Vegetable oils as fuels (University of Idaho) 200,000 100.000 52 Wheat, sorghum, and lorage unit. Lincoln. NE 300,000 150,000 53 Wheat quality labs a Wooster. OH 100,000 50,000 FY'91 House Senale ence BUDGET bill bill agree ment A-2 COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE GLOBAL CHANCE R Maple research (VI) 100 99 SPECIAL GRANTS Michigan institute 2.276 2246 Midwest biolechnology consortium 2,730 2,730 2.730 In thousands of dollars] Milk salely (PA) 285 283 Milkweed research (NE) 80 80 80 FY'91 Conter Minor crop pest control (HI) 285 285 285 House Senale once Minor use animal drugs (IR 4) R 450 450 450 BUDGET ball bill agree ment Mosquito research (AR, CA, LA, MS, TX) 456 453 Multi cropping strategies for aquaculture (HI) 150 150 150 (ITEMS MARKED National biological impact assessment R 300 300 300 Special Research Grants (PI 89 106) Allatoxin (II) "R") 115 131 Nematode resistance genetic engineering (NM) 150 150 150 Agribusiness management (MS) 100 15 New uses for agricultural products (OH) 150 140 Agricultural diversilication (III) 154 154 154 Non lood agricultural products (NE) 110 110 110 Agricultural management systems (MA) 350 215 Oil from jojoba (NM) 200 200 200 Agricultural Irade (ND) 600 596 Oregon Mass biotechnology 500 500 500 Agriculture utilization research (MN) 500 500 500 Pacific agricultural trade (HI) 225 Allernative cropping systems (Southeast) 270 285 211 Peach free short life (SC) 192 192 192 Alternative crops (ND) 500 497 Peanut breeding (GA) 95 47 Alternative marine and fresh water species (MS) 350 275 Pecan weevil (OK) 50 25 Allernative pest control (AR) 1.400 1.391 Pesticide clearance (IR 4) RX 3.000 3000 3000 Allernative to dinoseb (OR) 225 225 225 Pesticide impact assessment 2.968 2.968 2968 Animal health 5,705 Pesticide research (WA) 250 718 484 Animal sci food safety consortium (AR. KS. IA) 2,000 1.845 Phytophthora root rol (NM) 125 125 125 Animal wasle disposal (MI) 15 31 Plastic from cornstarch (NE) 40 40 40 Apple quality research (MI) 95 94 Polato research 1.327 1.415 1371 Aquaculture (general) 593 720 656 Preservation and processing research (OK) 267 265 Aquacullure (Stoneville) 612 588 600 Prime farm land reclamation (Il, KY) 675 609 Asparagus yield decline (MI) 95 94 Regional barley gene mapping project 175 350 262 Bean and beel (MI) 190 189 Regionalized implications of farm programs (MO, TX) 350 348 Beel fal content (IA) 400 200 Rural development centers (PA, IA, (ND). MS, OR) 500 500 500 Belgian endive (MA) 15 67 Rural economic development (GA) 750 744 Blueberry shoestring VNUS (MI) 92 92 92 Rural environmental research (IL) 150 15 Broom snakeweed (NM) 150 150 150 Rural policies institute (AR. NE. MO) 150 375 Celery fusarium (MI) 40 39 Russian wheat aphid (WA, OR, ID. CA) 350 350 350 Chesapeake Bay aquaculture 375 500 437 Salllower research (ND. MT) 250 248 Cool season legume research 250 500 375 Sandhills grazing management practices (NE) 100 40 99 Cottonseed extraction and oil refining (TX) 75 15 15 Seafood and aquaculture harvesting. processing. and marketing (MS) 3/3 400 61 Cranberry/blueberry disease and breeding (NJ) 260 260 260 Seedless table grapes (AR) 100 50 Dairy and beef photoperiod (MI) 33 33 Seedslocks enhancement (ND) 200 198 Dairy goat research (TX) 15 15 75 Small Truit research (OR, WA, ID) 250 125 Della rural revitalization (MS) 175 175 175 Southwest consortium for plant genelics and water resources 400 400 400 Dogwood anthracnose (GA. NC. IN) 200 100 Soybean bioprocessing (IA) 400 200 Dried bean (ND) 100 93 Soybean cyst nematode (MO) 385 333 Eastern filbert blight (OR) 50 100 15 STEEP water quality in Northwest 980 980 980 Enhanced liveslock production (ND) 300 250 Stone truit decline (MI) 285 283 Environmental research (NY) 350 297 Stored grain insects (KS) 285 285 285 Enthanol research (AR) 200 100 Subirrigation research (MI) 263 262 Expanded wheat pasture (OK) 275 275 275 Sunflower insects (ND. SD) 200 194 Export services (OR) 450 348 TCK smul (wheat) 250 250 250 Floriculture (HI) 296 296 296 Tropical and subtropical 3,341 3,299 3320 Food and Agriculture Policy Institute (IA, MO) 750 750 750 Urban pests (GA) 2 76 Food irradiation (IA) 200 100 Water management (AL) 400 397 Food marketing policy center (CT) 393 393 393 Water quality R 8,350 8.350 8 000 Food systems research group (WI) 222 300 261 Wheat genetic research (KS) 200 149 Grasshopper biocontrol (ND) 71 15 13 Wild nce research (MN) 100 50 Human nutrition research (NY) 800 556 Wood utilization research (OR, MS. MI) 2 852 2,852 2 852 Human nutrition research IA) 300 300 300 Wool research (TX) 250 146 198 Human nutrition (IA) 300 300 800 World food systems (IN. OH) 360 357 Integrated lorest management (AR) 50 25 Youth Science Camp (WV) 115 94 Integrated orchard management (VI) 50 49 R 4.000 4 000 4.000 Total Special Research Grants 25,597 56.909 56,811 976 Integrated pest management Integrated production systems (OK) 186 186 a Senate bill included $2690,000 under ARS International livestock program (KS) 95 94 Senale b.ll included $153,000 under ARS ITEMS ADDED BY CONGRESS: lowa biotechnology consortium 2.000 1756 Irrigation/lish production (AR) 335 167 lealy spurge biocontrol (MI) 250 125 $41,400,000 liveslock and dairy policy (NY. IX) 525 525 525 lowbush blueberry research (MF) 172 233 202 low input (MM) 200 111 BUILDINGS FACILITIES - CSRS A-3 COOPERATIVE STATE RESEARCH SERVICE '91 Budget House bill Senale bill Conterence agreement (=0) I Alabama Tuskegee University $800,000 $600.000 $700.000 2 Arkansas: GRANTS FOR OPERATION OF a Center for Alternative Pest Control 1,202 000 811 000 b Poultry and Isolation Facility. University of Arkansas/Fayelleville 428 000 337.000 INTERNATIONAL TRADE DEVELOMENT CENTERS C Poultry Center of Excellence 4,700 000 3750 000 d Rice Germplasm Center, Stuttgart 223,000 223 000 (') 3 Arizona: Agriculture research complex environmental stress lab () (1) 4 California a Alternative pest control containment and quarantine. University of California (2) ( ) ( ) '91 Budget b Grape Importation Facility, University of California at Davis 1233,000 561000 897 000 House bill Senate bill Conference agreement 5 Florida Biolechnology Institute. University of Florida Alachua 500,000 3,850.000 2,690,000 6 Georgia I CINTRAFOR/IMPACT $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000.000 a Biocontamment Research Center, University of Georgia 500,000 3,000 000 1992000 2 lowa State University 1,000,000 1.000.000 1,000,000 b Center for Advanced Water Technology, Savannah (²) (²) 3 University of Kentucky 227,000 227.000 227.000 C National Laboratory for Environmentally Sound Production Agriculture litton 300 000 300 000 4 West Virginia University 575.000 575.000 d Vidalia onion storage research lacility 225.000 (2) 5 Oregon Wheat Center 300,000 300,000 1 Hawaii Center for Tropical/Subtropical Agriculture 5675.000 5675000 5675000 6 University of Idaho 50,000 50,000 8 Idaho Biotechnology Facility 5,900.000 590 000 1 Eastern Europe and Soviel Centers 9 Illinois 400.000 8 New centers or existing centers 1,448,000 a. Biolechnology Center, Northwestern University (*) (-) b National Soybean Laboratory, University of Illinois 1750.000 1,484,000 161/000 Total -0- 2,227,000 5,000,000 3,152,000 IQ Indiana Molecular and Celtular Biotech Facility 1500.000 1 500 000 II Iowa TOTAL ADDED BY CONGRESS: $3,152,000 a Center for Food and Industrial Agriculture Product Development. lowa State University 3400000 2,122,000 3 100 000 b Human Nutrition Center. Iowa State University 1,750,000 2,439,000 1,755,000 12 Kansas Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Kansas State University 500,000 4,500,000 3.731.000 FEDERAL ADMINISTRATION OF CSRS 13 Maine a Food Salely Laboratory, University of Maine 93000 93000 b Masardis Research Farm 200.000 157.000 C Presque Isle Farm Building Consolidation 150,000 150000 14 Maryland: Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Science. University of Maryland (i) (') (¹) 15 Massachusetts Center/hunger, poverty, nutrition and policy () (i) '91 Bud. Conference 16 Michigan: Food Toxicology Center, Michigan State University 5,190,000 5076000 House bill Senale bill agreement " Mississippi: Center for Natural Products. University of Mississippi 3,850,000 (') (*) 18 Missouri Bennett Living and Learning Center. Lincoln University () () I Shrimp aquaculture $3,365,000 $3,365,000 $3,365,000 19 Montana Bioscience Research Laboratory, Montana State University 500 000 2000000 1250000 2 Mississippi Valley State University - 650,000 635.000 642,000 20 Nebraska Center for Advanced Technology. University of Nebraska 4,500.000 4,500,000 4 500 000 3 Ag in the Classroom 200 170,000 170,000 170,000 21 New Jersey: Plant Bioscience Facility, Rulgers University 5,000,000 2 544 000 4 Agricultural biotechnology 500 375,000 375,000 375,000 22 North Carolina Biolechnology Facillity 750,000 530.000 750000 23 North Dakota 5 Peer panels 400 250,000 250,000 250.000 6 Office of Grants -0- 575,000 568,000 a Animal Care Facility, North Dakota State University (2) (*) b Industrial Agriculture and Communication Center, North Dakota State University 500.000 1 Center for Agricullure and Rural Development (IA) -0- 750,000 741,000 2,511,000 2511000 8 1890 Capacity Building 11000 8,250,000 c Inst/Ag Health Science and Rural Medicine. University of North Dakola 4,488,000 2,892,000 8,250,000 8,250,000 9 Vocational aquaculture 1,000,000 500,000 d Seed Research and Regulatory Facility. North Dakota State University (2) (2) 24 New York New York Botanical Garden 10 Water quality 600,000 1,000,000 1,600,000 (') (2) 25 Oregon: Seafood Center, Oregon State University (2) (2) a Iowa State 1 ) (250,000) (250,000) - 26 Pennsylvania Center for Food Marketing. St. Joseph's University (i) 1,200,000 600 000 b North Dakola I ) (750,000) (750,000) 27 Rhode Island Building Consolidation. University of Rhode Island 1904000 1901000 C Southern Illinois University (600,000) 1 ) (600,000) 28 South Dakota Northern Plains Biostress Laboratory, South Dakota State University 500,000 2,261,000 1970000 II Geographic Information System 1,000,000 747,000 29 Tennessee: Nursery Crop Research Station 250,000 248 000 12 Maize Genetics Center (ND) 200,000 100,000 - 30 Texas: Inst/Biosciences and Technology. Texas A&M 2,300,000 3294000 2,797,000 13 Herd management (TN) (') 375,000 - 31 Utah Biotechnology Laboratory, Utah State University 1,388,000 280,000 14 Alternative fuels characterization (ND) 139 (2) 250,000 32 Vermont. Tree Physiology and Maple Research Laboratory, University of Vermont 375 000 372,000 other 33 Virginia: Agriculture Biotechnology Facility, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Total 12,339 14,985,000 16,245,000 17,933,000 1125.000 918,000 34 Washington Animal Disease Biolechnology Facility, Washington State University I 415.000 1005000 1 210 000 35 Wisconsin: , Senale bill proposed $750.000 under ARS Senate bill proposed $300,000 under ARS ADDED BY CONGRESS FOR 8 a Agriculture Biolechnology/Genelics Facility. University of Wisconsm/Madison 700.000 3,500 000 2,600.000 SPECIFIC LOCATIONS: $8,320,000 b Research greenhouse (2) (2) C Rural health information and technology initialive. Medical College of Wisconsin (2) (2) 36 Wyoming Environmental Simulation facility, University of Wyorning (2) (2) (2) 37 Miscellaneous Fund for reports 200,000 300,000 300,000 Total 45,361,000 61,758.000 62,867,000 Funded under ARS Buildings and Facilities Report on need and support for proposed facility TOTAL ADDED BY CONG: $62,880,000 U.S. FOREST SERVICE A-4 FOREST PROTECTION RESEARCH Corvallis, OR FOREST ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH COPE $150,000 Logan, UT-water quality Western conifer insect pests Fresno, CA: $100,000 100,000 Athens, GA-dogwood anthracnose 300,000 Sierra Nevada birds and wildlife Berkeley, CA-forest diseases 375,000 Habitat for furbearers 200,000 150,000 Pineville, LA-southern pine beetle 250,000 Spotted owl 150,000 Burlington, VT-atmospheric effects 59,000 La Grande, OR: 200,000 100,000 Lincoln, NE- stress physiology 50,000 Non-game research 200,000 Flagstaff. AZ western conifer insects 100,000 Elk-deer-cattle-timber 100,000 Madison. WI: Albuquerque. NM-rangeland rehabilitation Biological control 100,000 Tempe, AZ: 100,000 Root diseases 100,000 Water quality Wood product treatments 100,000 85,000 Spotted oul and other TES 100.000 East Lansing, MI-wildfire impacts 270,000 University Park, PA-watershed 250,000 Stoneville. MS--oak wilt 300,000 Amherst. MA wildlife 170,000 Honolulu, III- tropical forestry Juneau, AK- Sitka deer 400.000 190,000 LaGrande, OR-western spruce budworm 100,000 50,000 Corvallis, OR-COPE (fish habitat). 100.000 Morgantown, WV-gypsy moth 500,000 Honolulu. HI-endangered species 125,000 Gypsy moth research in PA 300,000 173,000 Rio Piedras. PR-endangered species Pear thrip research (150,000) 100.000 Oxford. MS water quantity Delaware, OH air pollution effects 50,000 Arcata, CA 219,000 8,544,000 3,339,000 Marbled murrelet (old growth) Total 77.000 Spotted owl Olympia. WA-spotted owl 880,000 150,000 RESOURCE ANALYSIS RESEARCH Wenatchee, WA-spotted owl 250.000 80.000 Neotropical migratory birds Missoula. IT--wilderness research 350,000 $100,000 Starkville. MS: Total Satellite/remote sensing 600,000 3,744,000 3,094,000 Inventory monitoring cycle 250,000 Portland. OR: International trade 800,000 150,000 FOREST PRODUCTS HARVESTING RES. Inventory monitoring cycle 300,000 Madison, WI: St Paul, MN: Timber bridges Inventory monitoring cycle 200,000 $50,000 Research benefits Adhesives 100,000 100,000 Asheville. NC--inventory monitoring cycle Wood decay 335.000 100,000 Ogden. UT inventory monitoring evele Biopulping 200,000 100,000 000 Anchorage, AK -inventory monitoring evcle 350,000 Panel products 100,000 Radnor, PA inventory monitoring cycle 300,000 Weathering 100,000 Chicago, IL urban forestry 150,000 Juvenile wood products 100,000 Fort Collins, CO: Biotechnology 100.000 Global change 75.000 Wetwood detection 78.000 Recreation fees 100,000 Portland, OR: Rio Piedras. PR-tropical forestry 150,000 Second-growth Douglas fir 100.000 Svracuse. NY Chicago urban forest climate study 300,000 Utilization research 100,000 Moscow, ID-engineering research 2,710,000 3,660,000 200,000 Total Surface metallurgy initiative. Forest Products Lab and Oregon Graduate Center 400.000 TIMBER MANAGEMENT RES. Bozeman. MT high elevation silviculture Total 1,688,000 1,4'18 100 Olympia, WA--alternative silviculture $318,000 Rio Piedras. PR: 300,000 Rehabilitating tropical forest lands Sustained use management 800,000 200,000 Growth and yield 300,000 Berkeley, CA- biotechnology 100,000 Redding. CA: 160,000 Old growth management Spotted owl habitat 187,000 Starkville. MS-seed quality 150.000 Honolulu, HI-tropical forestry 100,000 Olympic Natural Resources Center. WA 296,000 New perspectives in forestry 1,450,000 1,250 1,000,000 Total 1.901,000 3,361,000 APPENDIX B References APPROPRIATIONS BILLS, SUBCOMMITTEES, AND REPORTS Bill House Senate Conference Agency Subcommittee Number Report Report Report Defense Defense HR 5803 101-822 101-521 101-938 Energy: Fossil F. & Conserv. Interior & Rel. Agencies HR 5769 101-789 101-534 101-971 All Others Energy & Water Res. Commerce Commerce, Justice, State, HR 5021 101-537 101-515 101-909 etc. Interior Interior & Rel. Agencies HR 5769 101-789 101-534 101-971 EPA Verans, HUD, & Ind. Off. HR 5158 101-556 101-474 101-900 HHS Labor, HHS, Educ., etc. HR 5257 101-591 101-516 101-908 Education Labor, HHS, Educ., etc. HR 5257 101-591 101-516 101-908 NASA Veterans, HUD, & Ind. Off. HR 5158 101-556 101-474 101-900 NSF Veterans, HUD, & Ind. Off. HR 5158 101-556 101-474 101-900 Smithsonian Interior & Rel. Agencies HR 5769 101-789 101-534 101-971 GSA Treasury, Post Office, etc. HR 5241 101-589 101-411 101-906 Agriculture: Forest Service Interior & Rel. Agencies HR 5769 101-789 101-534 101-971 All Others Agriculture HR 5268 101-598 101-468 101-907