दस्तावेज़
Memorandum of Conversation with Secretary of State Dean Acheson and Deputy Secretary of Defense Robert Lovett
- इसका हिस्सा Dean Acheson Papers, Secretary of State Files
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 369
TOP BECRE
5
ARCHIVES RECORDS AND 79
"NATIONAL
E
SERVICE**
March 24, 1951
Mr. Lovett telephoned the Secretary at 9:20 this morning
and said that he had been with the Joint Chiefs of Staff for about
an hour discussing the MacArthur statement. The JCS had divided
the problem into three parts.
The first part related to the embarrassment with the 13
countries occasioned by MacArthur's statement at the time this
Government was negotiating with the 13 countries to agree on a
proposed statement by President Truman.
The second problem which this statement created was its
effect in complicating any US proposals looking toward a settlement.
It brought up the question again of how many negotiators there are;
i.e., whether the State Department, the United Nations or MacArthur
was the negotiator.
The third problem was the matter of military discipline.
The JCS had decided to a ddress themselves solely to that question
at the present. They were considering it in the light of the directive
of December 5 which had been sent to MacArthur, among others.
That directive specifically requires the Commander in the field
to clear any statements, speeches, or anything else relating to
political matters with Washington. They were also considering
it in connection with the March 20 announcement of the President's
intentions with relation to Korea (which Mr. Lovett said he thought
was a remarkably fine succinet pronouncement.
In the light of these two clear statements, it would be
perfectly obvious if it were anybody else who^had made the
statement which MacArthur made yesterday, he would be relieved
of his command at once. However, the JSC recognized that the
consequences of relieving MacArthur are startling. It would have
its effect at once in the field and it would probably prejutice the
success of the Japanese peace treaty negotiations. He said there
were other compelling considerations also. On the other hand, they
do not feel that they can just let this slide by.
DECLASSIFIED
E. O. 11652, Sec. 3(E) and 1(D) or (B)
5-12-26
Dept. of State letter, Aug.9.1973
TOP
Bz NLT- He NARS Date 6-24-26
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to