Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196064650
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2the
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
E.O. 12065,
Guidelines, March 6, 1982
WASHINGTON
State Dept. NLT, Date 9-10-85
By DEB
July 16, 1952
SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
EGYPT
The Secretary saw British Ambassador Franks on Tues- -
day at the latter's request. Franks said he had been in- -
structed to reinforce Eden's recent message to us requesting our support
for the UK in an approach to King Farouk asking him to change the govern-
ment of Sirry Pasha in Egypt. Franks also said the Foreign Office did not
agree with our recent suggestion that the British should consult with the
Sudanese and urge them to accept Egyptian sovereignty.
The Secretary said that we could not accept the im-
plications in Eden's message that it is now our responsibility to persuade
King Farouk to replace the Sirry government and to lay aside the question
of the title, and that we are not willing to be put in a situation where the
consequences for lack of success in any such approach to Farouk would fall
on the US. The Secretary said that in Ambassador Caffery's opinion it will
not be possible to bring about a change of government in Egypt by inter -
vening with Farouk and that a successor government would be no better than
Sirry's. Moreover, he pointed out that we have already tried to get the
King to lay aside the title question and it has not worked.
Ambassador Franks indicated that he would inform
London that the US was unable to meet Eden's request. Speaking personally,
Franks said he imagined that Foreign Office thinking tended toward the view
that the UK should make no move at this time unless the Egyptians requested
talks and that the next action would be in December when the Sudanese
Parliament was installed and could consider the question of sovereignty.
The Secretary expressed the belief that if nothing was
done until the Sudanese Parliament was established the Sudanese would be
so strongly headed toward a policy of no Egyptian sovereignty that we could
no longer expect them to accept Farouk's claim to be King of the Sudan. It
would then be necessary to deal with the Canal Base question in a bad atmos- -
phere and this in itself might lead to more rioting. This in turn would raise
the use of force to protect the base and possibly British and foreign nationals.
The Secretary ended the discussion by saying that we would continue, in
SECRET SECURITY INE ORMATION-