Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196816708
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12065, Sec. 3-402
State Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
March 30, 1951
By DEB NLT, Date 9-4-85
SECRE T
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
FOUR POWER
Ambassador Jessup feels that any posi-
EXPLORATORY TALKS
tive action in today's quadripartite
meeting on the new Soviet proposal
would probably result in a split in the Western position, and he proposes
therefore, pending further talks at Government level in Washington today,
that today's Paris meeting should be handled as follows: 1) It would be a
closed session (i.e. no press briefing); 2) Discussion would be confined
to testing the Soviet position on the actual wording by comparing their
March 28th proposal with our March 15th proposal; and 3) We would not
introduce the French proposal (the divided agenda) today. Jessup adds
that point 3 seems to him not a question of choice but an essential recog-
nition of the fact that there is no chance of a tripartite acceptance of the
idea of submitting the French formula in time for this afternoon's meeting.
SPAIN
A Foreign Office official has given
Embassy London the following informa- -
tion on British policy toward Spain. Consideration is being given to the
desirability of associating Spain in Western defense arrangements. The
Cabinet may possibly examine the substance of this question next week and
instructions may then be sent to Washington. However, the British Em-
bassy in Washington has been instructed to inform the State Department as
soon as possible that the UK could not agree with the US in the matter of a
unilateral approach to Franco, and hoped that there would be no further
publicity from the US. The British want it to be unmistakably clear to
Franco that the American approach was unilateral, and they want to avoid
the impression that British and French silence implied their acquiescence.
The Foreign Office official said that the
British position would probably have to be made public in London after
Parliament reassembles on April 3rd, if not before. He expressed the
personal view that arrangements with Spain should go beyond an exchange
of arms for bases, and should include economic assistance, which, however,
should not be granted unless Franco agreed to measures of liberalization.
SECRET