Images (2)
दस्तावेज़
| id |
id
196816711
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
WASHINGTON
Dept. Guidelines, March 6, 1982
E.O. 120/3 Sec. 3-402
State By DEB NLT, Date 9-4-85
April 4, 1951
SECRET
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
FOUR POWER
In the 22nd session of the Paris talks
EXPLORATORY TALKS
yesterday Gromyko said he considered
the tripartite proposed agenda of the
previous day to be unsatisfactory from the standpoint of the listing of
items, since it does not list the Soviet proposals on Trieste and on the
NAT and US bases in Europe and the Near East. Mr. Davies replied that
the new tripartite proposal included those items which the Soviets felt
were the most important and took account of all matters which the Soviets
had raised since the beginning of the talks. He asked why, after four
weeks, the Soviets had raised something completely new, and why, if
they considered the question of the NAT and the US bases to be so impor -
tant, had they not raised this question in the beginning, rather than after
four weeks of negotiations when the Western powers had already gone a
long way toward meeting the Soviet views. Davies stressed that there was
already ample room under Item I for raising this question at the Ministers'
meeting. Gromyko rejected this thesis, saying that he could not accept
any formulations which "drowns" this item in general language.
Yesterday's meeting was the shortest to
date. Jessup believes that Gromyko still has not received new instructions
from Moscow concerning the new tripartite proposal.
INDIA
Ambassador Henderson in New Delhi
has queried a high Indian Government
official concerning recent press reports of Soviet and Chinese grain offers
to India and has stated that it would be desirable if the Indian Government
could let us have some kind of statement about the situation which could be
made public. Henderson said he assumed that since India had no funds to
purchase more than four million tons of food grain, any purchases which
might be made from Russia or China would be the full four million tons,
and that there would still be an outstanding need for two million tons which
India was not in a position to purchase or obtain by barter. Henderson
SEGRET