Ask the Scholar

Document scope · 1 page
doc
Scholar
Ask about this object, its catalog metadata, its source description, or the page inventory. For page-specific OCR and visual context, open one of the page chats.

Scholar Source Context

Document identity
localId
1252248
label
3/6/75 - Opening Statement for Press Conference (Includes draft)
core
doc
dtoType
document
pageCount
1
Source metadata
id
1252248
contentType
document
title
3/6/75 - Opening Statement for Press Conference (Includes draft)
collections
President's Speeches and Statements Reading Copies (Ford Administration)
Reading Copies of Presidential Speeches and Statements
subjects
Cambodia
Vietnam (Republic)
Vietnam War, 1961-1975
Foreign aid
Press conferences
Speeches, addresses, etc.
imageCount
1
hasImages
yes
source
import
hasTranscription
no
Source extras
naId
1252248
coverageEndDate
day
6
logicalDate
1975-03-06
month
3
year
1975
coverageStartDate
day
6
logicalDate
1975-03-06
month
3
year
1975
levelOfDescription
fileUnit
recordType
description
ocrSource
nara-archive
Single page context
seq
1
pageIndex
0
type
document
mediaId
a6146fc8bc32aaa9
ocrText
The original documents are located in Box 6, folder "3/6/75 - Opening Statement for Press Conference (Includes draft)" of the President's Speeches and Statements: Reading Copies at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box 6 of President's Speeches and Statements: Reading Copies at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN ef OPENING STATEMENT FOR PRESS CONFERENCE THURSDAY - MARCH 6, 1975 -I- THE PRESIDENT HAS SEEN df. BEFORE WE START ON QUESTIONS TONIGHT, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT OF ASSISTANCE TO CAMBODIA AND SOUTH VIETNAM. THERE ARE THREE ISSUES. -2- THE FIRST THE FUTURE OF THE PEOPLE WHO LIVE THERE. IT IS A CONCERN THAT IS HUMANITARIAN -- FOOD FOR THOSE WHO HUNGER AND MEDICAL SUPPLIES FOR THE MEN, WOMEN AND CHILDREN WHO ARE SUFFERING THE RAVAGES OF WAR. - 3 - WE SEEK TO STOP THE BLOODSHED AND END THE HORROR AND TRAGEDY THAT WE SEE ON TELEVISION AS ROCKETS ARE FIRED WANTONLY INTO PHNOM PENH. I WOULD LIKE TO BE ABLE TO SAY THAT THE KILLING WOULD CEASE IF WE WERE TO STOP OUR AID, \ BUT THAT IS NOT THE CASE. -4-- THE RECORD SHOWS, IN BOTH VIETNAM AND CAMBODIA, THAT COMMUNIST TAKEOVER OF AN AREA DOES NOT BRING AN END TO VIOLENCE BUT, ON THE CONTRARY, SUBJECTS THE INNOCENT TO NEW HORRORS. -5- WE CANNOT MEET HUMANITARIAN NEEDS UNLESS WE ALSO PROVIDE SOME MILITARY ASSISTANCE. ONLY THROUGH A COMBINATION OF HUMANITARIAN ENDEAVORS AND MILITARY AID DO WE HAVE A CHANCE TO STOP THE FIGHTING IN THAT COUNTRY IN SUCH A WAY AS TO END THE BLOODSHED. - 6 - THE SECOND ISSUE IS WHETHER THE PROBLEMS OF INDOCHINA WILL BE SETTLED BY CONQUEST OR BY NEGOTIATION. - 7 - BOTH THE GOVERNMENTS OF CAMBODIA AND THE UNITED STATES HAVE MADE VIGOROUS AND CONTINUED EFFORTS OVER THE YEARS TO BRING ABOUT A CEASEFIRE AND POLITICAL SETTLEMENT. - 8 - THE CAMBODIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED A UNILATERAL CEASEFIRE AND CALLED FOR NEGOTIATIONS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE PEACE ACCORDS OF JANUARY 1973. - 9 - IT HAS SINCE REPEATEDLY EXPRESSED ITS WILLINGNESS TO BE FLEXIBLE IN SEEKING A NEGOTIATED END TO THE CONFLICT ITS LEADERS HAVE MADE CLEAR THAT THEY ARE WILLING TO DO WHATEVER THEY CAN TO BRING PEACE TO THAT COUNTRY. - 10 - THE UNITED STATES HAS BACKED THESE PEACE EFFORTS YESTERDAY, WE MADE PUBLIC AN OUTLINE OF OUR OWN UNCEASING EFFORTS OVER THE YEARS, INCLUDING SIX SEPARATE INITIATIVES SINCE I BECAME PRESIDENT. - 11 - LET ME ASSURE YOU: WE WILL SUPPORT ANY NEGOTIATIONS AND ACCEPT ANY OUTCOME THAT THE PARTIES THEMSELVES WILL ACCEPT; -12- AS FAR AS THE UNITED STATES IS CONCERNED, THE PERSONALITIES INVOLVED WILL NOT, THEMSELVES, CONSTITUTE OBSTACLES OF ANY KIND TO A SETTLEMENT. - 13 - YET ALL OF OUR EFFORTS HAVE BEEN REBUFFED PEACE IN CAMBODIA HAS NOT BEEN PREVENTED BY OUR FAILURE TO OFFER REASONABLE SOLUTIONS. THE AGGRESSOR BELIEVES THAT IT CAN WIN ITS OBJECTIVES ON THE BATTLEFIELD. THIS BELIEF WILL BE ENCOURAGED IF WE CUT OFF ASSISTANCE TO OUR FRIENDS. - 14 - WE WANT AN END TO THE KILLING AND A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT. BUT THERE IS NO HOPE OF SUCCESS UNLESS THE CONGRESS QUICKLY PROVIDES THE NECESSARY MEANS FOR CAMBODIA TO SURVIVE. - 15 - IF WE ABANDON OUR ALLIES, WE WILL BE SAYING TO ALL THE WORLD THAT WAR PAYS. AGGRESSION WILL NOT STOP; RATHER IT WILL INCREASE. IN CAMBODIA, THE AGGRESSORS WILL HAVE SHOWN THAT IF NEGOTIATIONS ARE RESISTED, THE UNITED STATES WILL WEARY, ABANDON ITS FRIENDS, AND FORCE WILL PREVAIL. - 16 - THE THIRD ISSUE IS THE RELIABILITY OF THE UNITED STATES. IF WE CEASE TO HELP OUR FRIENDS IN INDOCHINA, WE WILL HAVE VIOLATED THEIR TRUST THAT WE WOULD HELP THEM WITH ARMS, FOOD AND SUPPLIES so LONG AS THEY REMAIN DETERMINED TO FIGHT FOR THEIR OWN FREEDOM. - 17 - WE WILL HAVE BEEN FALSE TO OURSELVES, TO OUR WORD, AND TO OUR FRIENDS. NO ONE SHOULD THINK FOR A MOMENT THAT WE CAN WALK AWAY FROM THAT WITHOUT A DEEP SENSE OF SHAME. - 18 - THIS IS NOT A QUESTION OF INVOLVEMENT OR REINVOLVEMENT IN INDOCHINA. WE HAVE ENDED OUR INVOLVEMENT. ALL AMERICAN FORCES HAVE COME HOME. THEY WILL NOT GO BACK. - 19 - TIME IS SHORT. THERE ARE TWO THINGS THE UNITED STATES CAN DO TO AFFECT THE OUTCOME. FOR MY PART, I WILL CONTINUE TO SEEK A NEGOTIATED SETTLEMENT. I ASK THE CONGRESS TO DO ITS PART BY PROVIDING THE ASSISTANCE REQUIRED TO MAKE SUCH A SETTLEMENT POSSIBLE. TIME IS RUNNING OUT. END OF TEXT Dich, 7:30 release Sta Cement S Prr. Before we start on questions tonight, I would like to make a statement on the subject of assistance to Cambodia and South Vietnam. There are three issues The first is the future of the people who live there. It is a concern that is humanitarian food for those who hunger and medical supplies for the men, women and children who are have suffering the ravages of war. We seek to stop the bloodshed and end the horror and tragedy that we see on television as rockets are fired wantonly into Phnom Penh. I would like to be able to say that the killing would cease if we were to stop our aid, but that is not the case. The record shows, in both Vietnam and Cambodia, That Cor Communist takeover Janaria does not bring an end to violence, but on the con- subjects the innocent to new hourned trary, me the beginning of a-bloodletting. We cannot meet humanitarian needs unless we also provide some military assistance. Only through a combination of humanitarian endeavors and military aid do we have a chance to stop the fighting in that country end the in such a way as to no more bloodshed. - 2 - The second issue I is whether the problems of Indochina will be settled by conquest or by negotiation. Both the government of Cambodia and the have made vigorous and continual efforts over the years to bring about a ceasefire and political settlement. The Cambodian Government declared a unilateral ceasefire and Place called for negotiations immediately after the Paris Accords of January 1973. It has since repeatedly expressed its willingness to be flexible in leaders have seeking a negotiated end to the conflict. Its leudership-hose made clear that willing to do whatever They Mcan to bring peace to that country. they and peace The United States has backed these efforts. Yesterday, we made M public an outline of our own unceasing efforts over the years, including since 2 become President six separate initiatives over the past Let me assure you: We will support any negotiations and accept any outcome that - 3 - the parties themselves will accept; As far as the United States is concerned, the personalities involved will not, themselves, constitute obstacles of any kind to a settlement. Pence in Cambrolen Yet all of our efforts have been rebuffed. to offer has not been prevented by onr farture to offer measonable solutions The aggressor believes thatit can win its objectives on the battlefield. This belief will be encouraged if we cut off assistance to our friends. We want an end to the killing and seek a negotiated settlement. But there is no hope of success unless the Congress quickly provides the necessary means for Cambodia to survive. If we abandon our allies, we will be saying to all the world that war pays. Aggression will not stop; rather it will increase. In Cambodia, the aggressors will have shown that if negotiations are resisted conding for United State time, the I will weary, abandon its friends, and force will prevail. - 4 - The third issue is the reliability of the United States and yar own If we cease to help our friends in Indochina, we will have violated their trust that we would help them with arms, food and supplies so long as they remain determined to fight for their own freedom. We will have been false to ourselves, to our word, and to our friends. No one should think for a moment that we can walk away from that without, a deep sense of shame. This is not a question of involvement or reinvolvement in Indochina. We have ended our involvement. All American forces have come home. They will not go back. Time is short. There are two things the U.S. can do to affect will the outcome. For my part, I continue to seek a negotiated settlement. I ask the Congress to do its part by providing the assistance required to make such a settlement possible. Time is running out,