Memorandum, Notes on the Joint Session of Labor and Management Representatives
Images (4)
Document
| id |
id
122659766
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 4Joint Session of Labor and Management Representatives
2:45 P. M.
Dr. Steelman and Mr. Stowe met with the same industry representatives
and labor representatives that had met with the President at the opening
session. Dr. Steelman explained that Mr. Murray had requested a joint
conference since garly that morning but the operators had not cared to
enter into a joint conference and preferred to write a statement of the
situation. Mr. Fairless immediately indicated that there had been no
intent that the memorandum handed to Dr. Steelman at his request should
be considered as an offer to the union.
After this statement Mr. Murray immediately questioned whether
or not it was true that all the negotiations that had taken place or
might take place were based solely on adequate price relief to the
industry. Mr. Fairless replied "We would have to have assurances".
Mr. Murray then indicated that he thought the entire proceedings
had been rather stupid. He stated that, as he saw it, the industry
FRUMAN
had only two points - One, the Board recommendations must not be met
ARCHIVES -NATIONAL RECORDS ADMING
in their entirety and two, the industry was intent on subtracting
COUNTRY
recommendations as a basis for bargaining. He further indicated that
he could see no basis on which they could bargain if all bargaining
had to be contingent on some unkmown price grant to the industry.
After some rather heated exchanges on Mr. Murray's premises and some
strong speeches on free collective bargaining from Mr. Fairless, Mr.
Murray then stated "All right, now let's go into collective bargaining".
Mr. Murray's thesis was that since he did not care for the Board report
any more than the industry did and since the industry felt that
Terms
Subject
Labor disputes
Relations
belongs_to
belongs_to