Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
196067584
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 2NLT/NOVALADE), 435
OFFICE OF
THE SECRETARY OF STATE
they 12065, Sec. 3-402
1982
WASHINGTON
State DEP Dept. E.O. Guidelines, NLT, Date March 9-11-8) 6,
December 2, 1952
By
TOP SECRET SECURIT Y INF OR CMATION
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
KOREA
The Indian Ambassador in Tokyo in a conversation
with Ambassador Murphy has confirmed the remarks
of a member of his staff concerning the Chinese Communist attitude
toward the Indian resolution on Korea. The Indian Ambassador said
that while the Chinese at Peiping had not in so many words given prior
approval to the idea of the Indian proposal, they stated no objection
and allowed ground for inference that they favored the idea. The
Indian diplomat added that Foreign Minister Vishinsky's intervention
set forth in clear relief the extent of Soviet influence in Communist
China and is undoubtedly a revelation to many Indians.
Meanwhile, our Embassy in Pusan reports that
elaborate Government-sponsored preparations for General Eisenhower's
visit, plus a Korean press campaign implying that momentous results
will follow, indicate the Koreans are being led to expect great things
of the visit. Thus, in our Embassy's view, if immediate and dramatic
developments do not occur, considerable disappointment may develop
and popular resentment directed against the U. S. might follow.
IRAN
Embassy London reports the Foreign Office expects
to request our observations very shortly on a proposed
Parliamentary statement on the UK's attitude toward sales of Iranian oil.
At the same time, the Foreign Office is somewhat apprehensive that the
proposed statement might prejudice Iranian reception of any new proposals
to be put forth as a result of forthcoming US - -UK conversations in London.
The Foreign Office emphasizes, however, that it will be obliged to make
a statement if we do. In view of these facts, Embassy London recommends
withholding the US statement pending the London talks, unless there is
strong pressure for issuing it at this time.
Our Charge in Tehran states relations between
Parliament and Prime Minister Mosadeq's Government have deteriorated
since the November 25th session in which members of the Cabinet were
pressed hard by several deputies. This coincided with information to the
effect that some of Mosadeq's lieutenants are growing resentful at his
arbitrary actions. Only a small group is reportedly aware of the Prime
Minister's decisions before they are announced and our representatives
T OP SEGRET SECURITY INF ORMATION