Images (2)
Document
| id |
id
201772678
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 250
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY
WASHINGTON
DECLASSIFED
E.O. Guidelines, March 6-5-85 6, 1982
12065, Sec. 3-402
July 10, 1950
T op €
State By Dept. DEB NLT, Date
SUMMARY OF TELEGRAMS
INDIA
Officials of the Indian Foreign Office have expressed
to our Ambassadors in Moscow and New Delhi their
grave concern over the "inherent dangers" in the US position on Formosa.
The Indian Ambassador in Moscow told Kirk of information from the
Indian Ambassador at Peiping indicating that the Chinese Communists are
fearful that US military power in the Far East is being augmented for
future use against them and for the restoration of Chiang lai-shek to
power. The Indian Ambassador stressed to Kirk his fear that the Formo-
san issue may drag the USSR into war on the side of China, and he
appealed to the US to recognize the Chinese Communist government as a
"great and noble act" which would wean China from Kremlin domination.
After his talk with Kirk, the Indian Ambassador evidently recommended
to his Foreign Office that it urge the Chinese Communists not to take any
military action toward Formosa at this time. At the same time,
Secretary-General of the Indian Foreign Office Bajpai informed Henderson
in New Delhi that the Indian Ambassador at Peiping believes: 1) that Com-
munist China will attack Formosa in the near future even though such an
attack would mean war with the US; and 2) that the problem of Formosa
involves a real threat to the peace, since China could by invoking the Sino-
Soviet treaty ask for the USSR's assistance against the US. Bajpai told
Henderson of his own belief that there is a prospect of a US-Chinese Com- -
munist war over Formosa, and said he hopes the US could find some way
of alleviating the strain in its relations with the Chinese Communists.
BRITAIN
We have advised our missions in London, Paris, Rome
and the Bénelux countries, and our High Commissioner
in Germany that, although we are not aware of any lobbying on the part of
the British to water down the Schuman plan, we are disturbed over the
possibility that recent remarks by important British officials may cause
the European countries to slacken their efforts to reach agreement on a
treaty embodying the essentials of the Schuman concept. As a result, we
have instructed our missions to make clear to the governments to which