Images (3)
Document
| id |
id
6037279
|
|---|---|
| contentType |
contentType
document
|
| source |
source
import
|
Source image fields (6)
Extracted text
OCR Page 1 of 31961 JUL 21 18 40
OFF SECY OF DEFENSE
EYES ONLY
July 21, 1961
SECRET
Dear General Norstad:
I enjoyed reading your recent telegram regarding Berlin (ALO 565)
to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. I agree thoroughly
with you on the need for a position of great flexibility in preparing
for a Berlin crisis. Your comment on the desirability of arranging
our preparations so as to avoid stimulating counterproductive Soviet
reactions seema to me very well taken. You can be sure that your
suggestions will be taken fully into account in our preparations for
a Berlin crisis.
I wanted, in this connection, to write you my views concerning the
relation to that crisis of the military planning which NATO will be
discussing and undertaking in the months ahead.
1 am anxious that this discussion and planning be geared, insofar
as feasible, to needs which will be particularly important in the
light of the Berlin crisis recognizing that this crisis may last
for a very considerable period, on an on-again off-again basis.
This would mean, I should think, focusing particularly on efforts
(i) to fulfill approved (MC-70) NATO force goals, particularly on
the Central Front; and (ii) to agree on the need to improve the
mobility, equipment, training, and manning levels of these forces,
as you have recommended in your 1966 goals -- beginning with units
which are in existence or can be created fairly quickly.
I hope that the Alliance can concentrate on this in the months ahead
and that allied agreement and action on these programs will not be
delayed in an attempt to secure agreement on more long-term pro-
posals, notably those for nuclear programs additional to MC-70.
I understand the military considerations that have prompted you to
seek MRBM's as part of your 1966 force requirements, in order to
fulfill the nuclear strike functions now performed by your strike
airerait. I also understand the long lead time necessarily involved
in any such program.
DECLASSIFIED
E.O. 12958, Sec. 3.6
non 932006
SecDef Cont. No. 1425
cy 2.
By mRlej
Date 3/13/96
Terms
Relations
belongs_to