Ask the Scholar
Page 2 of 2
I can add historical knowledge about this page.
Page image
OCR
November 7th, 1932.
Mr. Edwin F. Smith,
Edwards, Smith & Dawson,
1 Exchange P1.,
Jersey City, N.J.
Dear Mr. Smith:
I have your letter of November 4th, together
with copy of the Opinion handed down in the New Jersey Court
of Errors and Appeals in the matter of Weinstein vs Blanchard.
This decision certainly seems to cover the question
of the Statute of Liminations as applied in the radium cases,
and I think it is a most fortunate break for us.
I also recall very distinctly that your position
all along, as relates to the Statute of Limitations, has been in
line with this decision, and I want to congratulate you on
finally having your position sustained.
Very truly yours,
President.
CBLee:RH
Page data
- Page
- 2
- Source index
- 0
- Type
- document
- Media ID
- 9bcda68789446e77
- Size
- unknown
Document data
- ID
- 75727321
- Core
- doc
- Type
- document
DTO data
{
"id": "75727321",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727321",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Edwin F. Smith, November 7, 1932",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727321",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Context sent to Scholar
Document identity
{
"localId": "75727321",
"label": "Letters Sent to Edwin F. Smith, November 7, 1932",
"core": "doc",
"dtoType": "document",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727321"
}
Document source metadata
{
"id": "75727321",
"sourceUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727321",
"contentType": "document",
"title": "Letters Sent to Edwin F. Smith, November 7, 1932",
"citationUrl": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727321",
"collections": [
"Safety Light Collection",
"Records Related to Radium Dial Painters"
],
"iiifBase": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.jpg",
"thumbnailUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.jpg",
"largeImageUrl": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.jpg",
"imageCount": 2,
"hasImages": true,
"source": "import",
"hasTranscription": false
}
Document source extras
{
"url": "https://catalog.archives.gov/id/75727321",
"naId": 75727321,
"levelOfDescription": "fileUnit",
"recordType": "description",
"ocrSource": "nara-archive"
}
Page context
{
"seq": 2,
"pageIndex": 0,
"type": "document",
"url": "https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorage/lz/electronic-records/SLC/Radium/SLC_0002719.pdf",
"mediaId": "9bcda68789446e77",
"ocrText": "November 7th, 1932.\nMr. Edwin F. Smith,\nEdwards, Smith & Dawson,\n1 Exchange P1.,\nJersey City, N.J.\nDear Mr. Smith:\nI have your letter of November 4th, together\nwith copy of the Opinion handed down in the New Jersey Court\nof Errors and Appeals in the matter of Weinstein vs Blanchard.\nThis decision certainly seems to cover the question\nof the Statute of Liminations as applied in the radium cases,\nand I think it is a most fortunate break for us.\nI also recall very distinctly that your position\nall along, as relates to the Statute of Limitations, has been in\nline with this decision, and I want to congratulate you on\nfinally having your position sustained.\nVery truly yours,\nPresident.\nCBLee:RH"
}