Letters Received to C.B. Lee, May 4, 1936

COLLINS & CORBIN COUNSELLORS AT LAW CLEMENT K. CORBIN ROBERT J. BAIN EDWARD A. MARKLEY CHARLES w. BROADHURST 1 EXCHANGE PLACE, HOWARD F. MC INTYRE JAMES B. EMORY JERSEY CITY, N.. J. PATRICK F. MC DEVITT JOHN F. LEONARD JAMES J. LANGAN RAYMOND J. LAMB EARLE J. HARRINGTON STANLEY G. BROOKS May 7, 1936. Connolly VS. U. S. Radium Corp. Messrs. Sehne ider & Schneider, 11 Commerce Street, Newark, N. J. Att. Jacob Schneider, Eag. nek: In eccordance with our telephonic talk today, intinuing over the motion to diamiss the above case ak of prosecution for two weeks from May Sth, to May upon the understanding, however, that on May 28nd, the will be argued and the case disposed of unless it is inued without costs in the meantime. This ad journment t n to cover any understanding you may have had with If you will exemine the correspondence you will dia on Maroh 9, 1936 I wrote you that the case would have to oe discontimied or moved. On Maroh 10th I was advised that you would be in touch with me. On March 23rd you re- quested me to send you a discontinuance which I sent you on March 25th. on March 25th you said you would send for your clients and have then sign the aiscontiruance. Then hearing nothing further, we served you with a notice of motion f or non- pros returnable at Newark, which was for several weeks ago, the motion being returnable on April 22nd. You then called me and asked for an adjournment of two weeks which I gave wit hout question and served a new motion returneble at Trenton before Judge Forman, in accordance with Judge Clark's direction, for May Sth. Now we are ad journing this motion for two wed a until May 23nd and trust that the case can be disposed or on that day, if not sooner. I am sending a copy of this letter to Mr. Smith. Yours very truly, EAM: AG E. A. MARKLEY